On CBS.com: Share YOUR travel photos at Amazing Race
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 48 of 123:
Next »
« Previous
But....
I'm convinced that SMTP servers should be required to scan all outgoing mail using current virus technology. If the server does not identify itself as a self-scanning system, then all other servers should reject traffic from it...period.

There are two BIG problems with that.

1.) The first problem lies in the fact that SMTP technology is NOT limited to ISPs. ANYONE with an internet connection can download, install, configure his/her own SMTP/POP3 server. There are an awful LOT of apps out there with those capabilities. Many of them are even free and come in all flavors for both Linux and Windows machines. These SMTP apps don't HAVE to route outbound e-mail through the ISP's server - unless the e-mail is being sent to someone on the same domain. They can send e-mail DIRECTLY to the destination server.

2.) The second - and more critical issue - MANY of the viruses out there today have their own built in SMTP functionality - thus bypassing the ISP's SMTP servers entirely. You can have THE finest possible Antivirus scanners working on the ISP's SMTP servers, but if the e-mail isn't routed through them, then it's not going to catch anything. This is why e-mail scanning is usually relegated to the POP3 side of the equation...

The only way to make things work would be to force ISPs to monitor activities on port 25 for all of their clients for 'excessive' quantities of outbound e-mail.

But this opens yet another can of worms... Do we really, REALLY want our ISP's spying on our e-mail? And who's to say what's 'excessive'?

Is that new flurry of outbound mail a virus or is it legit business - i.e. a wedding/birth/party announcement? An updated resume to prospective employers? Or a really funny off color joke that had you ROFLMAO-PIP that you couldn't resist sharing with 50 or 60 of your closest e-mail buddies? Or maybe even photos from your latest African safari? Or maybe it's some work-at-home mom's monthly newsletter to her clientelle.

Then there's the question of how much extra it would cost an ISP to actually DO that level of monitoring... How much is the new hardware that'll monitor their clients is going to cost and how much extra it will cost them in terms of labor.

There's no clear cut and simple and fair solution to this problem.
Posted by: Wolfie2K3   Posted on: 02/17/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I'm SO sick of this...  BitTwiddler | 02/17/05
Only a slight deterrent...  shawkins | 02/17/05
Yeah... good one  animlchin | 02/17/05
well, how about this....  TechType | 02/17/05
Virus scanner  mmaizel | 02/19/05
authenticated smtp  linuxoverwindows | 02/19/05
What about Spoofing??  djc1309@... | 02/18/05
nah, as an isp, we know...  linuxoverwindows | 02/19/05
quit blaming the victim ...  tmooretxk | 02/17/05
well....  TechType | 02/17/05
amen  linuxoverwindows | 02/19/05
Minor point ...  stormaz@... | 02/17/05
I don't know if I'd call them the victims  voska | 02/17/05
Not Really  osreinstall | 02/17/05
Don't have viri/worm/spyware problems either, never have.  Laff | 02/17/05
even my doze boxes are clean  linuxoverwindows | 02/19/05
Why SHOULDN'T you be responsible?  djc1309@... | 02/17/05
scanning smtp...  linuxoverwindows | 02/19/05
Victims or lazy people?  openMind | 02/17/05
spam  linuxoverwindows | 02/19/05
Why are you responsible for breathing?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/17/05
lets be realistic... and unrealistic  net2dave | 02/17/05
yes, but....  TechType | 02/17/05
agreed, but still problematic  net2dave | 02/17/05
Agreed  TechType | 02/17/05
Licensed user  Real World | 02/17/05
great idea, never happen  net2dave | 02/17/05
i have said that 1000 times...  linuxoverwindows | 02/19/05
average users need help not punishment  bouncybrit | 02/17/05
But ...  stormaz@... | 02/17/05
yeah, but...  linuxoverwindows | 02/19/05
I disagree  voska | 02/17/05
bad analogy  johnnyu | 02/17/05
Enough blame to go around me thinks. MS and  Laff | 02/17/05
absolutely  johnnyu | 02/17/05
true...  linuxoverwindows | 02/19/05
thats better happy  linuxoverwindows | 02/19/05
and who pays for it?  net2dave | 02/17/05
I wouldn't...  Patrick Jones | 02/17/05
emissions testing?  linuxoverwindows | 02/19/05
isp police  linuxoverwindows | 02/19/05
Only a slight deterrent  pagestylers@... | 02/17/05
yeah, we do that...  linuxoverwindows | 02/19/05
30 days - for whom?  st1_z | 02/17/05
Scaning outgoing emails for viruses  Ian Mack | 02/17/05
Only a slight deterrent...  AmusedAtItAll | 02/17/05
I can do many other tricks....  shawkins | 02/20/05
But....  Wolfie2K3 | 02/17/05
some problems...  linuxoverwindows | 02/19/05
Only a slight deterrent...  robert_craigiii@... | 02/20/05
hold on a minute  Sxooter_z | 02/17/05
hold on a minute longer  mmazur@... | 02/17/05
Make that another minute  AmusedAtItAll | 02/17/05
Figuring out whom to punish requires  t.e.sumner@... | 02/17/05
I think it's time we also got tough on..  IT Scion | 02/17/05
Believe it or not...  AmusedAtItAll | 02/17/05
ISP's and Scanning  caeciszek | 02/17/05
afraid to have SMTP servers do scanning  Jim Johnson | 02/17/05
sloppy OS's  WillemGrooters | 02/17/05
Can you say the word "LINUX"???  jan5055@... | 02/17/05
it's a windows world...  TechType | 02/17/05
Can you say the word "LINUX"???  jan5055@... | 02/17/05
Bill is not gonna give up  lengua99 | 02/18/05
If you're not willing to make a change...  Michael Kelly | 02/17/05
Can you say the word "LINUX"???  jan5055@... | 02/17/05
I am willing to make changes  TechType | 02/17/05
Yea Sure  osreinstall | 02/17/05
Typical MS drone response  AmusedAtItAll | 02/17/05
Do Linux users lack common sense?  jgorenflo | 02/17/05
First and foremost  IT Scion | 02/17/05
We do SMTP scanning  IT Scion | 02/17/05
smtp scanning of a virus?  st1_z | 02/17/05
Knocking at my door  t.e.sumner@... | 02/17/05
Microsoft, anyone  ccollins@... | 02/17/05
test? you've got to be kidding...  kipmartin | 02/17/05
scope check  net2dave | 02/17/05
Kidding?? Only partly...  shawkins | 02/18/05
Punishment and liability  gardoglee | 02/17/05
That's not the way the Internet works  wresnick | 02/17/05
The real source of virus attacks?  cdgoldin | 02/17/05
Actually they don't have to ...  ttocsmij | 02/17/05
Be real......  jgorenflo | 02/17/05
Strange they don't seem  lengua99 | 02/18/05
Should SMTP servers be requird to scan all outgoing mail?  dcharon1@... | 02/17/05
Scan all outgoing mail (mailservers and ISP's)  dubrosky | 02/17/05
Itr should be more than a suggestion  IT Scion | 02/17/05
SPF is the part of the answer.  davidbuj@... | 02/17/05
Isn't that a MicroBorg specification?  shawkins | 02/17/05
Get off the Merry-Go-Round!  kbeartxzd | 02/17/05
popularity  Bad_Hair | 02/17/05
That's only a part of the picture  kbeartxzd | 02/17/05
You mean from what you've heard  lengua99 | 02/18/05
Part of the problem or part of the solution  jibuib | 02/17/05
All files should be scanned  neverhome | 02/17/05
It may slow the outbound emails  IT Scion | 02/17/05
Idealistic approaches are great  IT Scion | 02/17/05
A couple of questions  AmusedAtItAll | 02/17/05
All very good points  IT Scion | 02/18/05
burden  wessonjoe | 02/17/05
The bottom line is...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/17/05
And that could happen quite easily...  Michael Kelly | 02/17/05
That's not the whole answer  agottschald | 02/17/05
How does that help?  AmusedAtItAll | 02/17/05
Have you seen MS's new anti-spyware app?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/18/05
Secure the SMTP servers, don't add overhead by scanners  anon00anon | 02/17/05
I agree  agottschald | 02/17/05
I am not sure even that will work.  djc1309@... | 02/18/05
Use packet inspection  osreinstall | 02/19/05
IT'S NOT JUST THAT WINDOZE IS POPULAR!!!!!  kbeartxzd | 02/17/05
Get out that bible and hit the street corner...  jbigger1 | 02/22/05
Uh Uh, Nope, No!!!  richdave | 02/17/05
Don't doubt for a second that you can  PA-ITGuy | 02/17/05
MyDoom worms, et al  ttocsmij | 02/17/05
Just stop using Windows  kokuryu | 02/17/05
RIGHT ON!  kbeartxzd | 02/17/05
Or Maybe.....  jgorenflo | 02/17/05
Or if they copied it from someone else...  kbeartxzd | 02/18/05
It is really no big deal for ISPs  agottschald | 02/17/05
That exactly my point  IT Scion | 02/18/05
All well and good  Goannaoil | 02/17/05
A friend of mine  lengua99 | 02/18/05
get a mac  hipparchus2000 | 02/18/05
getting in a little fishing before lunch?(nt)  IT Scion | 02/18/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement