On TechRepublic: 12 tech terms that make you sound old
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 22 of 52:
Next »
« Previous
Active X IS part of IE when it has to be "turned off" deliberately
I'm not sure whether we haven't got down to the level of nit picking now. My intention was to highlight the fact that IE is not a sepearte browser, it is a "set" of Windows OS functionality. Because of this, any IE flaw, whether that be an Active X thing or a IE Help thing, is not a flaw with a browser, it is a flaw with the OS - Windows - which the browser code has been heterogeneously mixed into. Your intention seems to be to deny that there is a problem, and to tout the flawed IE as a stand-alone application from Microsoft, which it isn't.

Nothing personal, you understand. Here's some interesting links about the very latest "IE patch".

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/10/ie_sp2_exploit/
Code which exploits a vulnerability in the HTML Help control of Internet Explorer has been released onto the net. Secunia has upgraded the vulnerability, uncovered in October 2004, to "extremely critical". Even users who have upgraded to Windows XP SP2 with all available patches are affected, the security reporting firm warns.

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1750426,00.asp
Microsoft Patch Day Lacks an IE Fix By Ryan Naraine
January 11, 2005

RELATED LINKS
Hackers Tune In to Windows Media Player

Microsoft has released a fix for a critical hole in the HTML Help ActiveX control in Windows, but a well-known vulnerability in the Internet Explorer browser remains unpatched.

Just days after a researchers raised the threat level because an IE exploit was making the rounds, Microsoft rolled out a patch that lessens the danger. But officials admit that a comprehensive browser fix is not yet ready.

In the absence of a browser fix, Microsoft released MS05-001 to plug a "critical" code execution flaw in the HTML Help ActiveX control. The advisory warned that a successful exploit could allow an attacker to "take complete control of an affected system" to load, manipulate or delete data.

The HTML Help flaw is rated critical in Windows 2000, Windows XP Service (including Service Pack 2), Windows 98 and Windows NT. In Windows Server 2003, the severity rating is moderate.
Posted by: whisperycat   Posted on: 02/09/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

this comment disturbs me  Monkey_MCSE | 02/08/05
Easily misunderstood  NonZealot | 02/08/05
Actually I think the text...  ShadeTree | 02/09/05
I need comprehension?  Monkey_MCSE | 02/09/05
maybe a little strong with words prior  Monkey_MCSE | 02/09/05
The comprehension problem you had is...  ShadeTree | 02/09/05
well if thats the case  Monkey_MCSE | 02/09/05
Still your problem.  ShadeTree | 02/09/05
For those who care about the truth  NonZealot | 02/08/05
Not quite...  Yensi717 | 02/08/05
???  NonZealot | 02/08/05
The only FUD factory here is you  Chad_z | 02/08/05
Hehe  NonZealot | 02/08/05
I'll be waiting for your reply  Squawkbox | 02/08/05
lol  toadlife | 02/08/05
For those who care about the truth  AmusedAtItAll | 02/08/05
IE is part of the OS. IE is NOT a standalone browser  whisperycat | 02/09/05
Get real!  htotten | 02/09/05
Like it or not, IE vulnerabilities are OS vulnerabilities  whisperycat | 02/09/05
Explain to me then  htotten | 02/09/05
Try This Then Htotten  itanalyst | 02/09/05
Active X IS part of IE when it has to be "turned off" deliberately  whisperycat | 02/09/05
Ever feel like you are talking to a brick wall?  NonZealot | 02/09/05
Stop, stop, I can't take any more ...  whisperycat | 02/09/05
Active X isn't the problem  voska | 02/09/05
Might as well be, why else would you run Windows?  voska | 02/09/05
Mine's updated! happy  Grayson Peddie | 02/08/05
So's mine  AmusedAtItAll | 02/08/05
TC, i dunno if you meant to or not  Monkey_MCSE | 02/08/05
"Grayson T. Peddie" is my real name.  Grayson Peddie | 02/08/05
Re: "Grayson T. Peddie" is my real name.  ReFoRMaT | 02/10/05
Message has been deleted.  Jeff Spicoli | 02/09/05
Yeah, making fun of someone's name...  ShadeTree | 02/09/05
Agreed.  htotten | 02/09/05
The problem is you can't fix suck a FUBAR O/S !  realitycheck101 | 02/08/05
Glad they're ON THE JOB...  Feldwebel Wolfenstool | 02/09/05
Troll Alert! Message has been deleted  Roger Ramjet | 02/09/05
Ahuh, ahuh, ahuh....  BitTwiddler | 02/09/05
If you do a Thesarus search for"Wolfenstool"  Squawkbox | 02/09/05
Re: Glad they're ON THE JOB...  ReFoRMaT | 02/10/05
Don't Forget...2nd Tuesday of Every Month Is Microsoft Procurement Day!  itanalyst | 02/09/05
at least  rcark01 | 02/09/05
Silver lining  tic swayback | 02/09/05
only you  rcark01 | 02/09/05
Don't knock boingboing  tic swayback | 02/09/05
Patches affecting VPN Client?  wolvrne88 | 02/09/05
lmao...  ReFoRMaT | 02/09/05
Are you kidding me?  Delmont | 02/10/05
Re: Are you kidding me?  ReFoRMaT | 02/10/05
BTW Re: Are you kidding me?  ReFoRMaT | 02/10/05
Forget patches, let's talk about licenses...  KeJorn | 02/10/05
MS updates  paxian | 02/13/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here