On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 6 of 33:
Next »
« Previous
Fewer Bugs Versus Simpler Application
You're almost right, except when they start talking about the number of bugs per thousand lines of code. This is the big equalizer. If you write a sofware with 1000 lines of code or a billion, statistics tell us that you will have an average of x amount of bugs per 1000 lines of code. This statistic is much more telling that the total number of bugs discovered. Microsoft might have some of the best coders in the world working for them, but their design teams are horrible. The biggest reason for this is Microsoft has decided that quantity over quality is the development paradigm that suits them well. They'd rather introduce 10 new functions that have been tested/debugged 95% of the way rather than cut that number to 6 and squeeze out that final 5% of testing to make absolutely sure the code is solid. The reason for this is simple...Microsoft is in business to make money selling software and services. This is why it's no surprise that open source projects have greatly fewer bugs in the code...no pressure to get a product to market and make money off of it.
Posted by: jasonp@...   Posted on: 02/04/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

how many of these did they fix?  reid.thompson@... | 02/04/05
Was something broken?  The King's Servant | 02/04/05
Was something broken? YES  reid.thompson@... | 02/07/05
Hmmm  Linux User 147560 | 02/04/05
100% honest question  NonZealot | 02/04/05
Fewer Bugs Versus Simpler Application  jasonp@... | 02/04/05
Assumes a linear progression of bugs  NonZealot | 02/04/05
What about the severity of the bugs?  Hugh Jass | 02/04/05
lint and char[256]  hipparchus2001 | 02/04/05
Don't forget  seosamh_z | 02/06/05
Um, never....  Jomo_z | 02/07/05
Would this mean...  Mack DaNife | 02/07/05
Well..  d_jedi | 02/04/05
Stored procecures aren't used often  voska | 02/05/05
My experience differs  NonZealot | 02/05/05
Not with "in house" projects  toadlife | 02/05/05
Spoken like a true technotard  Chad_z | 02/04/05
Chad, your noise is missing the point  DePiep | 02/05/05
Chad the Great  seosamh_z | 02/06/05
MySQL is a companies product  B.O.F.H. | 02/06/05
RE: 100% honest question  richdave | 02/05/05
This isnt a troll...  vdraken | 02/04/05
The comparison is...  The King's Servant | 02/04/05
I was so concerned.....  michael-t | 02/04/05
Few bugs.. I don't think so!  d_jedi | 02/04/05
and your point is? nt  michael-t | 02/04/05
Isn't Coverity typical commercial code?  gsbtech | 02/04/05
Linux ratio is 1/17,000, not 10,000  DePiep | 02/05/05
Courage.  richdave | 02/05/05
YA GOTTA BE KIDDING ME!!  Xunil_Sierutuf | 02/05/05
Finally!  Outside T. Box | 02/07/05
Another cheap marketing gimmick  tpepernic | 02/05/05
"Commercial Code"?  Rodney Davis | 02/07/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline