On TechRepublic: 10 lame phrases to cut from your resume
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 13 of 27:
Next »
« Previous
Server answer
Spyware needs to function as a server. If the daemon can't be installed, how can it behave as a server?

First off, I'm not exactly sure what you mean by "server". Spyware doesn't really provide a service to other programs on your computer or to other computers on the network which would be the traditional definition of a server. It simply sits there listening for various events on your computer and then uses that information for various purposes. However, I'll use the word "server" in the rest of this post just so we don't get into a semantic discussion.

Spyware certainly does not need to function as a "server". In its simplest form, spyware that is piggybacked onto seemingly helpful software is just a part of that application and is only active when that application is running.

However, even if spyware needed to run as a "server", not all servers need to be installed as daemon/services. The only thing that daemon/services gives you is the ability to have the server running when no one is logged onto the computer. Since spyware is useless unless there is someone logged onto the computer, the spyware simply starts when the user logs on and the spyware gets shut down when the user logs off. It might be a "server" but it doesn't need to be active when no user is logged on and therefore does not need to be installed as a daemon/service. daemons/services are always "servers" but not all servers have to be configured as a daemon/service.
Posted by: NonZealot   Posted on: 01/20/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story No further replies to this post will be accepted.

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Bwahaha!! Microtrash at it again!  Jeff Spicoli | 01/20/05
OMG!  Roger Ramjet | 01/20/05
Our guys estimate 50% reduction  Chad_z | 01/20/05
Correction on a couple points  NonZealot | 01/20/05
Correction on my correction!  NonZealot | 01/20/05
Correct on correction  Sunny Jalolly | 01/20/05
Incorrect correction  Roger Ramjet | 01/20/05
Correction on incorrect correction  NonZealot | 01/20/05
Questionable correction on incorrect correction  toomuchgreeatea@... | 01/20/05
Good question  NonZealot | 01/20/05
Re: Good question  toomuchgreeatea@... | 01/20/05
Correction: Re: Good Question  toomuchgreeatea@... | 01/20/05
Server answer  NonZealot | 01/20/05
Yeah  Jeff Spicoli | 01/20/05
Civil penalty  jsjag1 | 01/20/05
Um..  Patrick Jones | 01/20/05
Most spyware never give the choice  voska | 01/20/05
Pop up window  jsjag1 | 01/20/05
I NEVER click on ANY buttons  Jeff Spicoli | 01/20/05
Gator..  Patrick Jones | 01/20/05
RE "Civil penalty"  ajapierce | 01/20/05
You said it!  Roger Ramjet | 01/20/05
What "are" you talking about  jsjag1 | 01/20/05
MICROSUCKS should be sued big time !!!  realitycheck101 | 01/20/05
How about this.  Scubajrr | 01/20/05
Mercenary Hackers  Roger Ramjet | 01/20/05
The sky is falling -- NOT  Sunny Jalolly | 01/20/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More