On mySimon: Samsung 55" LED TV
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 8 of 15:
Next »
« Previous
Yep, yep
So many of them claim security right out the box, but some have more holes than others that security is more than just running it right out of the box. Unfortunately, Windows has a lot of spaghetti coding that makes it more vulnerable to missed messy code and exploitable features. Most of the others have great peer review, and a lot less malicious review (and intentions against) so those bug traps are filled with positive feedback, not scores to dole out on the unsuspecting. Put a bad admin/overly privileged user on a system and expect bad things, even on a solid system with solid applications - the weak link can be the user.
Posted by: FilledOut   Posted on: 12/01/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

That's it!  GRindinAxTaRupy | 11/28/03
Thats not it  crocd | 11/28/03
I disagree  master of illusion | 11/28/03
Wi-Fi security...  MalumRegnat | 11/28/03
Oh my goodness, is that Redhat box vulnerable too  FilledOut | 11/29/03
Nahhh  FilledOut | 12/01/03
but! but! but!  nite_w0lf | 12/01/03
Yep, yep  FilledOut | 12/01/03
Yep, yep  FilledOut | 12/01/03
Wireless security is possible, but . . .  Eqwatz | 12/01/03
There also appears to be a lack  Eqwatz | 12/01/03
If I'm not in a rush or such . . .  FilledOut | 12/02/03
Wi-Fi home users and security  gardoglee | 01/12/04
Most Users Know JACK  b_t_f@... | 07/24/05
Linux isn't as secure as you think?  asha57 | 07/17/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc