On The Insider: Backseat Confessions with Levi Johnston
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 4 of 7:
Next »
« Previous
Succesfull try, actually
Nothing to say in refutation then, just a nebulous, all encompassing denial? Are you going to deny that Microsoft lied in court and falsified evidence, in their efforts to ENSURE that IE was seen as a part of the Windows OS and not a stand alone browser? That would be laughable in the face of so much empirical evidence. The FACT is that IE functionality was co-mingled with Windows low level OS functionality, in order that IE could be bundled with every PC. So IE flaws are WIndows flaws. And Windows flaws infect non-Windows users, including, (as per this article) mobile phones. You're obviously strongly aligned with the convicted monopolists who's shoddy software infects non_microsoft users PC and mobile devices, prompting your wishy-washy how-dare-you-slate-Microsoft post.

Baaaaah!
Posted by: whisperycat   Posted on: 11/11/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Just wondering how long  Squawkbox | 11/09/04
Another Windows specific Trojan blights the rest of the world  whisperycat | 11/10/04
Lies, Damn Lies and ABMers  Confused by religion | 11/10/04
Succesfull try, actually  whisperycat | 11/11/04
Trojan viruses can not really be called viruses.......  GregSalts | 11/11/04
Doubtful  lengua99 | 11/11/04
Gee, looks like my refusal  Linux User 147560 | 11/10/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement