Patch in for Microsoft server spoofing flaw

TalkBack 3 of 4:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

Did it really say that?

Didn't the article say that in order to exploit this flaw, a user would have had to be lured to a malicious site first? And that the malicious site sould then have had to exploit the flaw to place malicious content in the cache? And then, a user accessing the cached content would be think that the cached content was trusted when in fact it was not trusted?

That seems to me to be obscure enough to be called "Important" and not "Critical". If you feel it should be "Critical", then please tell us why.

Posted by: johnwsaundersiii@...   Posted on: 11/10/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• VMware Infrastructure: A Guide to Bottom-Line Benefits VMware Frustrated by the costs of maintain ever larger data centers?or building ... Download Now
• Server Consolidation and Containment With Virtual Infrastructure VMware To meet the constant demand to deploy, maintain and grow a broad array of ... Download Now
• Five Steps to Determine When to Virtualize YourServers VMware Server virtualization isn't just for big companies. Entry-level ... Download Now