On TechRepublic: 12 tech terms that make you sound old
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 24 of 26:
Next »
« Previous
Wheel Turnin More Like It
With the infrastucture of information as it is, it is nice to be able to color ones point necesitating needed security by including those listed here.

Let me qualify that however, was watching one of those 90s movies where there was the idea of 'spys vrs spys in the cold war. A single disk containing the names of our agents in foreign lands, and the idea that freelance people would have that information for a price.

Now I 'used the 'think, in this way, there was an invariable reason to recognize the parrallel world of newtons gravity, vrs the lightweight stipulation in einsteens electron holding mention via the persons names on a disk. With that of person holding it. It was scary. Some kind of Schendlars list, of wich for whatever reason, if YOU are on it, you have to have the same weight as the reaction to it.

For some reason though,the apathy towards holding information in a quantitative fashion,doesn't seem to deem itself the same 'state of meaning these days. With so much as a library of 'text fitting onto a single disk,you are certainly not going to be doing that in newtons world without a couple of vans,and a few large wharehouses.

With the 'microscopic information realm, it is not an apherent right'' to quantify personal information. This is difficult to see in a given aspect,where authority is deeming itself hierarchy,and there are differences of 'place for each 'person of them. Just to be able to quantify information does not mean that the information is a qualified right''through that preposition.

Just because a computer does this,or that much information can be used on the newton side,it does not mean that the person of that information isn't just as 'qualifyable to its relationship in scale,that 'quantification gives to its contigoucy.

So to make this shorter, the government puts everybody at risk by encapsulating 'quantifyable information, maintaining its 'right to do so.They put much larger problems at risk by doing so. So the person of this information age must be aware of the representation of association of information,along with the choice to refuse participation.

The government can go all around making 'record,in order to 'sift,parse,compare,even compose. However in this assesement is the same apathy I noted, that there is no reason quantifiable information is a justification for 'qualifying it as a 'right to have. Now you could go into reading even basic social security documents, to see that the government indemnifies itself,at all angles, to position itself to title of information. Having within laws created to simply exempt itself from certain responsibilities.

So when you go into whooing what is needed for security. You must realize that individuals are going to fight to keep their own goods. Realize that the government puts itself at risk,because creating these relationships beyond the person of its information,creates risks for those persons. Even when the government will shamelessly denie itself criteria of responisiblity to it.

If the story tellers want to color their articles with the most volatile selection of industry wich is utilizing the microscopic of the digital age they should here also realize their is more response to that than only data could maintain . Since most of us simply dont have the data. (hhhammm..hm.)

But the government creates volatility when the create quantities carelessly . Since the strength of this is that persons will take care of their own. Even though a govy may not recognize this.

-just talking.
Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 10/21/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Maybe because there are MANY more important security issues.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/21/04
No disrespect but the Internet IS a REAL threat !  realitycheck101 | 10/21/04
spyware is big business  V Sanders | 10/21/04
Only if your foolish enough to allow it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/21/04
half of all drugs are now grown or made in the usa  V Sanders | 10/21/04
Hold on  seosamh_z | 10/21/04
Your catching on...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/21/04
I think not  seosamh_z | 10/21/04
You bet I do...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/23/04
Tell me something I don't already know...  realitycheck101 | 10/21/04
More Sky Marshalls, less pie in the sky  Nigel Johnstone | 10/21/04
Yeah but  seosamh_z | 10/21/04
Stop for a moment  Nigel Johnstone | 10/21/04
Calm down  seosamh_z | 10/21/04
What was the death toll for MyDoom?  Nigel Johnstone | 10/21/04
Just to keep the party going  seosamh_z | 10/22/04
Worthless word games  Nigel Johnstone | 10/22/04
truely lacking in imagination  seosamh_z | 10/22/04
No flew a jet into skyscaper before 9/11  voska | 10/22/04
Cyber security is important  voska | 10/22/04
They're kidding, right?  Bill4 | 10/21/04
You never know  rpmyers1 | 10/21/04
I've seen it and it probably is  voska | 10/22/04
Wheel Turnin More Like It  ParadigmOdyssey | 10/21/04
Do you really want the Government providing "leadership"  Squawkbox | 10/21/04
Checks and Balences  Roger Ramjet | 10/22/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet and his Workspace on TechRepublic. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and