Piracy fears threaten Hollywood innovation

TalkBack 1 of 93:

Next »

• Thread View
• Flat View

Why Isn't There A Standard

for copyright in the digital effect ? That is a set of plausible references so that authors in light of 'copyright could choose to use them for their own works ?

There was a story on the bureua of national standards speaking of encryption a while back. But there is not a standard of 'copyright, in wich an author in-and-of-copyright, can take advantage of its 'manufacturer without cost, that technology affords it.

With this there is the same advantage of the consumer wich stands to benifit, if we ever get the choice to debate the relationship of 'owning,the effects,as contrasted to 'right of copyright as well. An author does not 'sell their copyrighted works, they sell the 'effects, I do not buy a copyrighted work, I buy the 'effects. So with a discription of authors to wich entails just what they can be,along with the equality of the consumer to prevail in recognizing it, what is do difficult of counting our receipt,and arbitration to that ?

The studios did not own phongraph companies,the styluses,the studio equipment,nor the broadcast stations of wich they farried the 'authority of copyrighted 'right . Only 'product the studios have is that of the DVD,theatre movie,or television broadcast. And they do not 'own these. Howebeit,the consumer has always 'owned their effects as a relationship to this 'right of performance , and supposedly from the authors choice of doing so.

Consumers need playback,receipt,specification,and self arbitration of digital copyrighted performances. Movable,mentionable digital effects, known to be the same mention 'in right of copyright, as those told to/or from an author of them.

The technology wich vitalizes the performance of copyright is not detailed in copyright itself. Although the relationship of 'right,can be included to venture beyond portrayal wich present day affuendos of copyrighted works detail in premise. That is something different from a 'piracy premise, to something as a 'feature set premise, for the digital works in copyrighted effects.

What is known of these present day copyrighted works,are not known through them the ideas of 'manufacturer without cost. Or that royalty is sublet to author,in its very own respect of 'effect,and distribution.

Copyrighted works for studios do not have inclusive arbitration to ramsack participants of publications used in utility of digital, or delegate 'clause that they should expect anything other than the security of their own persons, with the collection of them. No inclusion of 'sanctioned databasing,or search, is formulated on the basis of the utility of a digital work. That is something that has been usurped on the part of usury through the discrediting of the persons that use and enjoy copyrighted works.

Anyway,the idea of movable,receiptable,fully buyer arbitrated right, should be something considered to be at the stake of the bureua of standards. In that the choice of utility is exactly that wich from an author/authority is equal to that of wich the consumer can rest to.

It is a rather easily done mention to create these standards of choice. Since if a copyrighted effect decides it does not participate,it should not be included to the feature wich a consumer can be party to.

-just talking.

Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 09/29/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Building the Virtualized Enterprise with VMware Iinfrastructure VMware VMware virtualization software has been adopted by over 120,000 enterprise ... Download Now
• Virtualization: Architectural Considerations And Other Evaluation Criteria VMware Of the many approaches to x86 systems virtualization available in the ... Download Now
• Five Steps to Determine When to Virtualize YourServers VMware Server virtualization isn't just for big companies. Entry-level ... Download Now