On MovieTome: Highest Metascore Streaming Movies
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 46 of 63:
Next »
« Previous
When the captain ignores the charts and puts the ship on the reef...
he has put himself between a rock and a hard place.

The simple fact is that Windows 3.1 and previous were written in a DOS pre-security era. Nothing was done to improve this with Windows 9x/ME because they were single user systems with no underlying security.

The No-Brainer IS THE EXACT REVERSE. When Microshaft decided to compete with the mainframe/mini market, they hired away a good chunk of the core NT programmers from Digital Equipment. The systems in use at that time for mainframe/mini computers were multi-user/multi-tasking systems that always had security emphasized first and the Windows NT crew used that model to create the "NEW TECHNOLOGY" version of windows. It was written from a pre-MS-DOS security-based era.

The problem came about because it wasn't a very good gaming OS, video wasn't fast enough, users had to understand something about security, device drivers weren't always available. So in the ensuing versions, security was unbolted, subverted, drilled through and upended so things like browsers, et. al. could work on it. As a matter of course, the original design team quit.

It got handed over to the Windows9X crowd for improvements (security breaches) and you have the sorry mess you see today. You cannot simply bolt a patch on the USS Cole to cover the Al Quaida bomb-blast hole. You cannot simply cobble together security overnight to fix the rat infestation that Windows NT became.
Posted by: boomslang_z   Posted on: 10/08/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Let's see how this one gets defended...  Linux User 147560 | 09/20/04
From Gartner?  quietkey | 09/20/04
Nope; Gartner wants to "prove" objectivity...  Anton Philidor | 09/20/04
Really, the IKEA owner said that?  Confused by religion | 09/20/04
Gartner: Biggest beta test--Windows  Loverock Davidson | 09/20/04
Get a life!  crocd | 09/20/04
Make me! (NT)  Loverock Davidson | 09/20/04
Life Donated to Loverock....done!  crocd | 09/20/04
Make War, not Loverock! (NT)  Xunil_Sierutuf | 09/20/04
That was funny happy (NT)  Loverock Davidson | 09/20/04
Lovey....Why do you support MS with such furvor?  Laff | 09/20/04
Spot on...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/20/04
Hey there AX....  Laff | 09/20/04
well said  V Sanders | 09/20/04
Normally I would argue about how one-sided you are...  nucrash | 09/20/04
Yes and no  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/20/04
Nobody expects perfect  Michael Kelly | 09/20/04
Better is elusive.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/20/04
The fundamental problem with software design  tamuhockey | 09/20/04
Pretty much..  d_jedi | 09/20/04
don't forget to patch that IE you don't use  V Sanders | 09/21/04
Perfect software is not impossible...  jvahabzadeh | 09/20/04
I have to argue that with you.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/20/04
There error rate you speak of  Linux User 147560 | 09/20/04
Proves it isn't perfect.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/20/04
How does hardware  Linux User 147560 | 09/20/04
i have to give ya this one  Monkey_MCSE | 09/20/04
i have to give ya this one  Linux User 147560 | 09/20/04
I agree  CobraA1 | 09/20/04
But that is NOT what the military has said.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/21/04
Small code?  dlevesqu | 09/20/04
Actually no, the code is quite small.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/21/04
Well said.  doe_z | 09/20/04
Microsoft isn't the solution to  prong@... | 09/20/04
You imply a conflict of interest ?  Jkirk3279 | 10/08/04
1. We've know this for years, 2. It can never be fixed  Xunil_Sierutuf | 09/20/04
Not 100% correct  crocd | 09/20/04
Windows isn't the problem, its end-user stupidity.  tamuhockey | 09/20/04
Only Windows has STUPID USERS?  Update victim | 09/20/04
No, of course not.  tamuhockey | 09/20/04
Exactly...  Omch'Ar | 09/20/04
tamuhockey , what have you been smoking?  Wings_z | 09/20/04
Dont Confuse Them!!!!  DragonBRockin | 09/20/04
RIGHT ON!  bhanes@... | 09/21/04
Microsoft is between a rock and a hard place  George Jay | 09/20/04
When the captain ignores the charts and puts the ship on the reef...  boomslang_z | 10/08/04
Article's purpose is overlooked perhaps  crocd | 09/20/04
Still in beta  htotten | 09/20/04
Spam is in decline?!?!?!  eLurker | 09/20/04
Sounds right to me.  Anton Philidor | 09/20/04
I agree with you  tamuhockey | 09/20/04
Odd he didn't touch on Spyware...  BitTwiddler | 09/20/04
this is very true  Monkey_MCSE | 09/20/04
I feel your pain  AbsolutelyNot | 09/20/04
is this a company computer?  balsover | 09/20/04
Company computer  bhanes@... | 09/21/04
The patience of users  Anton Philidor | 09/20/04
I prefer not to waste my hardware  Seething Ganglia | 09/20/04
I am shocked!  michael-t | 09/20/04
Who would .. expect that ....  michael-t | 09/20/04
MS and the media copanies are mad now  V Sanders | 09/20/04
Don't kill the messenger  doggyboy | 09/20/04
Dear Mr. Gates  itanalyst | 09/21/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More