On CHOW: Holiday side dishes
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 6 of 9:
Next »
« Previous
More to Authentication Systems Than Hash Functions
(sigh)

Yes, we live in a world where people implicitly "trust" computers... even programmers.

However, authentication system designers have been aware of this issue for a long time. They typically include things such as: fixed bit patterns, time stamps, and message length information into the hash stream. Each of these elements must also pass for the message to be authenticated, not just the hash itself. Thus, the colliding random pattern is unlikely to pass one or more of these tests.

This is the difference between having cryptographic algorithms available and designing a secure system. And the difference between cryptanalytic attacks and successful system exploits.

Steven Davis
ceo "at" secureplay.com
http://www.secureplay.com/
Posted by: secureplay_z   Posted on: 08/19/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I could be wrong but....  computer_man | 08/17/04
here's a tool to hack MD5 and SHA1  +-Chris-+ | 08/17/04
Dictionary attacks  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 08/18/04
Mathematically Interesting - But Practical?  secureplay_z | 08/18/04
Impracitcal?  wresnick | 08/18/04
More to Authentication Systems Than Hash Functions  secureplay_z | 08/19/04
word.  feralchimp | 08/19/04
Plagiarist!!  dangermouse1956 | 08/19/04
All Roads Lead To Rome  catgic | 08/19/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here