How spyware works--and burns

TalkBack 19 of 28:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

Business Ventures

That spells 'all right''? Spyware means nothing if it there is not a 'person to associate to its definition. 'Spyware has nothing to do with 'retail shopping software, and again P2P fundamentals ALL in the same paragraph.

The 'venture here,is climbing onto the concept of an ADVERTISING WEB. This is well and fine IF you want to PARTICIPATE to it. As a desktop personal computer user, it is not to my advantage to detail MY WEAKNESS in its person for someone elses gain against that weakness. Even though the story stumbled through its quant of detail, a stereofeed from my perspective would display the trite of my own fears. Even though unfounded, the 'venture would find them quite addaquete an accesory for 'accomadation . (LOL).

I have MY future outlook of how I would like things to be. Unfortunately for 'spyware, and plenty of 'legal limbo this space does not include my person. Only knowledge of my accesory.

The 'legal limbo would like to tell you that the 'concept can only be used via the 'accesory without its person to object. However the concept itself does not require the respect of any person to be an admonisher of it. (Web Advertising being the standard bearer of person of use interaction).

If you look at the last 'Lost In Space movie. You see this child holding a video console with the picture stating 'such and such industry name, making a future for .."" in wich the kid replies ''gimme a break''.

Spyware as an accesory,and Addware as a concept then ? Problem is 'you do not have a liscence to remove my person from being so. This is the billy to so much of agreements gleefully putting 'program as an agreement into parse of user-support,and programs themselves. While they are legal ease , nobody can conceptually separate the 'machine from the person in 'end-use.

If is a flaw in the organization of the web ,internet as a character. Since a 'person of use,was not contributive to the variations in wich businesses compete in person.

Desktops should not be here to 'win it, or loose it between them. There is no contest where there is no participation.

End-use should share the wealth basically.Something 'liscences can gainfully exploit from their tallies.

Developers should stride to defeat. Dont mean the 'advertising concept. I mean the fact that 'wealth is created for anybody but the person of them.

Ventures will get over it of course. (LOL). Probably not in the same paragraph,to depart from an obligatory conflict an accesory of style. But if you cant create the association of person, you cannot create the perspective of 'spyware.

see ya.

-just talking.

Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 08/17/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Busting the myths about QuickBooks Enterprise Solutions and IBM Smart Business IBM So you already know there aren't actually any alligators in the New York ... Download Now
• Virtualization: Architectural Considerations And Other Evaluation Criteria VMware Of the many approaches to x86 systems virtualization available in the ... Download Now
• Why Isn't Server Virtualization Saving Us More? A Few Small Changes May Dramatically Increase Your Efficiency VMware Companies have rapidly adopted server virtualization over the past few ... Download Now