On GameFAQs: The top 10 most terrifying PC games
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 14:
Next »
The best example to follow.
How many high-scale companies that are infringing upon somebody?s intellectual property do not let others do the same to them?

Or to put it differently ?
How many high-scale thieves think it?s OK to steal somebody?s property and it is not OK to steal anything from them?

Or to say it short ?
How many high-scale companies use double standards?

It?s a lot - Microsoft, Apple, ... etc., including the government.

Thus, do they have rights to protect our properties (CD/DVD, etc.) from being using by us as we wish?

Hey, big guys - do not steal and we can talk about your rights on our property. But wait; are we living in a communist country? Note: in a communist country you have no rights, freedom and property but the government.

I do not understand ordinary people who support CD/DVD copy protection. Why do they VOLUNTARYLY agree to lose one of the main distinguishing feature of capitalism ? your property is your property? How are we better than a communist dictatorship where your property is not yours anyway?

And what the hell does G.W. Bush need to install ?freedom? in other countries if he has no freedom in own country? Why do I say so? Because the U.S. laws, such as the Patriot act, are the same that were used by Hitler. G.W. Bush and Co. (including John Kerry) just translated them to English. This Neo-Nazi Co. just has not decided yet to use them full force, but if you would able to elect a president who can stand for you, they may use the Patriot act to prevent their war-profits from the coming of true democracy. The Patriot act was created to protect crooks from justice.

Look at the facts:

G.W. Bush and Co. (including John Kerry) attacked Iraq because they had (drug-induced?) vision that Saddam has 3,000 nuclear warheads and is ready to blow up the World.

Therefore, they are blowing up Iraq and found no Weapons of Mass Destructions.

In a process of WMD search they had killed by CONVENTIONAL weapons MORE than 6,000 Iraqis. Compare - Saddam with U.S. permission and by U.S. supplied WMD killed only 5,000 Kurds. Why so little? I guess, because he was not smart enough to lean the basics of murdering from U.S. instructors and was not able to kill by WMD more than US troops by CONVENTIONAL weapons.

Then G.W. Bush chose an excuse - he said we want to ?liberate Iraqis from Saddam to make Iraqis happy?.

He put Saddam in jail, brought new ?democratic? government and the biggest ?democratic? troops in the World on every street of Iraq, but it made Iraqis unhappier than they were with Saddam.

To make Iraqis more happy ?liberators? sexually abused them but for ?unknown? reasons Iraqis did not like it either.

Should we be curious why G.W. Bush did not send US troops to liberate millions of Sudanese from being exterminated? Or why G.W. Bush totally missed genocide in Rwanda?

Summary of the above -

How do you call a country that:

Implemented Hitler?s laws (G.W. Bush installed, probably, the worse laws in the World ? the Patriot Act).

Intentionally blames and abuses people and countries in what they did not do.

Brutally lies to cover up its own illegal activity.

Attacks another country for no reason.

Kills thousands of civilians for nothing.

... (the list is going on)

And does not let you to save your money by sharing songs and movies with your friend.

So, how do you call this country?



Remember, whatever name you will choose for this regime - that?s the country that OFFICIALLY is the best example in the World to follow.

Just a question:

Can you imagine where we are going?

And more importantly ? will you support this regime (will you buy copy-protected CD/DVD etc.)?

P.S. The government approved laws and technologies that allow them to spy on everybody and everything legally (RFID, etc.)? No privacy anymore; they did just like Hitler and Stalin did (they spied on everybody to kill those who were disagreed with the regime). I hope, now you can give the right answer to the question: are they doing it to protect you or protect them from you?

Many believe that this will protect us from terrorism. The same stories were told by Hitler and Stalin ? Hitler spied to protect Nazis from communists, Stalin did the same defend communists from the rest of the World. Both regimes had died. Now G.W. Bush is trying to repeat the experience of Hitler and Stalin as a positive for the U.S. invention (positive for who?). If you think this is good ? try to answer other questions about who in reality orchestrates terrorism around the world? Maybe not al-Qaeda?

Can you tell me why Osama bin Laden, who solely controlled all Afghanistan and ?hates? America most (as G.W. Bush and Co. want us to believe) suddenly ordered not to attack U.S. occupation forces in Afghanistan? (This is the only explanation of why Afghanis were ready to fight against U.S. occupation and DID NOT FIGHT AT ALL). Is it because Osama bin Laden loves the U.S. or because he still works for the U.S. to help war-oil makers to make more money on his terrorism? (Terrorism is a part of corporate business model they pay for).

Iraq (Saddam) did not want to have any dealings with al-Qaeda. Can you explain why al-Qaeda retaliated against Spain for Iraq that hated al-Qaeda (!!!) but leave the U.K. and U.S. alone? This is not logical (al-Qaeda do nothing for those who hate al-Qaeda - the U.S. and UK and at the same time took a side of those who hated them - Iraq. Is it so hard to blow up U.K. or U.S. trains (compare it with 9/11)? Is Spain the only country that forced U.S. and U.K. to attack Iraq? Or because attacking UK and U.S. just would not be beneficial for images of ?terrorism-eliminators? - G.W. Bush and T. Blair (they swear to us that bombing Iraq is surely preventing terrorism against U.S. and UK)?

According to Israel - Yasser Arafat is the guiltiest person in anti-Israeli terrorism. Note: Israel does not hesitate to kill anybody they think is a danger to Israel even if it is against the U.S. or the World policies; Israel ignores the UN resolutions, etc. Do you know why Israel keeps ?the most dangerous? for Israel leader - Yasser Arafat alive but kills lesser evils ? Hammas leaders? Is it because Yasser Arafat is an Israeli spy and giving up all true terrorists (freedom fighters for independence too?) to Israel (the U.S., U.K.?)? We know that Palestinian government including Yasser Arafat is highly corrupted; we just do not know by whom (the countries).

I guess if the majority won?t buy government?s BS like ?inevitable liberation of Iraq for 500 $billons +?; ?al-Qaeda put down the WTC because the CIA, FBI and Pentagon knew about it but were too busy with something more important than caring about the WTC, etc.? ? it would drastically diminish terrorism because nobody will pay for things that do not make money (terrorism). If you will able to elect your government for you ? many teracts would never happen; till this moment will come high-scale Mafia controls the government you believe was elected by people and use it as a tool to make highly profitable business (war with Iraq, combats with ?smoke? instead of ?fire? like US anti-AIDS ?help? in Africa which will safe/prevent nobody for your expense, etc.).

P.P.S. Those who they claimed as potential terrorists see (at least saw) the U.S. as an escape goat from own government or people and, logically, have NO REASONS TO ATTACK the escape goat (the U.S.).

P.P.P.S. About CD/DVD copy protection:
If you will do nothing now and everybody in the World will have to pay FULL price for MS Windows, MS Word, etc. ? the vast majority will have no choice but to switch to Open Source.
Then we will say to Microsoft, Apple, ? welcome to shared 3% of the market (3% on all proprietary copy-protected companies).

They think we can grow money on trees; apparently we cannot.
Posted by: Vily Clay   Posted on: 08/16/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

The best example to follow.  Vily Clay | 08/16/04
The answer is very easy  Jeff Spicoli | 08/16/04
If people would understand it .. I would say more and you? (NT)  Vily Clay | 08/16/04
Of course I would  Jeff Spicoli | 08/16/04
Here we have a problem with typical human psychology.  Vily Clay | 08/16/04
Also modern day stupidity  Jeff Spicoli | 08/16/04
A logical chain.  Vily Clay | 08/16/04
If you had a point it was lost in the rambling.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/16/04
There were few points but all of them lead to the one conclusion (NT)  Vily Clay | 08/16/04
Yawn  FilledOut | 08/16/04
ON SALE! Buy two evils, get the third FREE!  Xunil_Sierutuf | 08/16/04
you are anti-American join Abul  Hamburger Chef | 08/16/04
Degreed Hamburger Chef from India needs job  Hamburger Chef | 08/16/04
Yuck Content Gaurd  ParadigmOdyssey | 08/16/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement