On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 2 of 20:
Next »
« Previous
Product Cost
I design software. You never add cost onto users for security. You should always build your software with security in mind rather than try patching later. Microsoft is a good example of how to do things completely wrong. They thought of security after the product had been sold.

Microsoft has never filed in any published papers that adding security to their software is bringing up the cost. Until I see such a paper your statement is incorrect.
Posted by: OhMyGosh   Posted on: 07/30/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Imagine why products cost so much  Enterprise. Analyst | 07/29/04
Product Cost  OhMyGosh | 07/30/04
BS Alert  nikoli | 07/30/04
But his post about MS is correct  voska | 07/30/04
Agreed  nikoli | 07/30/04
Product cost relates the demand and quality  crocd | 07/30/04
Let's legislate them out of existence!  Martin Marvinski | 07/30/04
You hit the nail on the head  buxxmaster | 07/30/04
Remember when MS was geting ready to take over the ....  nite_w0lf | 07/30/04
Paranoid Much?  nikoli | 07/30/04
Not paranoid at all  nite_w0lf | 07/30/04
Me Too  nikoli | 07/30/04
Me Too  nite_w0lf | 07/30/04
Are You 12 ???  nikoli | 07/30/04
Switch  Loverock Davidson | 07/30/04
That  Linux User 147560 | 07/30/04
Maybe the MS search will be the patch  nite_w0lf | 07/30/04
My Dirty Little Secret  richardpor | 07/30/04
Google.... Little secret...  gsxrhawaii@... | 12/22/04
All this article says is Google is the best!  PmAc_z | 08/03/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here