On TV.com: Dollhouse CANCELED, What Went Wrong?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 4 of 15:
Next »
« Previous
US Gov't protecting Sony profits in Australia?
"Despite the High Court ruling in favor of Stevens, the decision was later overturned by the government after the U.S. government pressed it to make legislative amendments to protect Sony's right to restrict where consumers buy its software from."

Does anyone else find it hilarious to see the US Government exerting influence and expending political capital to protect the profits of a foreign corporation?

To the person who ranted "why pick on Google or Yahoo" I guess you don't understand the impact of widespread data collection and data mining. The end result at the corporate level is ultimate discrimination: if a company knows everything about you, they can discriminate against you in many ways that you don't even know about.

The travel industry does it TODAY: if they know you are a business traveler, then you will pay 20-50 percent MORE for services than if you are a tourist. That's a Runzheimer statistic, not a wild guess at the future.

The insurance industry does it TODAY: your insurance rates are based as much on your credit score as it is on your claim history. People with high credit scores make less claims, so they are more profitable customers.

Hiring organizations do it TODAY: Search companies sell your information to potential employers, ranging from "public" information like things you have posted in blogs, Facebook, Youtube, etc., to info you might have though was private, like your search history to cancer or alcoholism sites. Take a lot of prescription pain meds? That information can well be known to a potential employer, insurer, or even a local business who wants to sell to you.

The key to all of this is the breadth and capability of data collection and mining to pull together a bunch of disjointed data points (to you at least) and make a coherent dossier of the data to someone with money (not you). This places individual persons at a disadvantage to corporations designed to exploit you. From a legal perspective this is a fallacy of the "corporation is a legal person" concept, because they enjoy powers that few real people have available to them.
Posted by: terry flores   Posted on: 02/22/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

What does Google and Yahoo have to do with the issue?  wackoae | 02/22/08
Someone's channeling Emily Litella!  none none | 02/22/08
The issue  stomfi@... | 02/25/08
US Gov't protecting Sony profits in Australia?  terry flores | 02/22/08
IT'S OUR FAULT not theirs  thespasticone | 02/23/08
Re: IT'S OUR FAULT not theirs  none none | 02/23/08
You missed the point entirely  terry flores | 02/24/08
And then there is the danger of drawing the wrong conclusions  roaming | 02/25/08
RE: Its our fault.....  bfilipiak@... | 02/25/08
Blame the victim! Good answer, good answer!  Ole Man | 02/25/08
Judges are worse than idiots  KrazyGuy | 02/25/08
RE: Judge on privacy: Computer code trumps the law  woot@... | 02/23/08
The Judge's Point  sboverie@... | 02/25/08
RE: Judge on privacy: Computer code trumps the law  KrazyGuy | 02/25/08
corporations and the internet and lawmakers  vilppuu@... | 02/26/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement