Before the NBMers weigh in
AbsolutelyNot | 07/27/04
|

but but but but but
Squawkbox | 07/27/04
|

Sort of
prong@... | 07/27/04
|

odd
eLurker | 07/28/04
|

IE's secutity holes MORE SEVERE than Firefox's
Peter Reaper | 07/29/04
|
hmmmm
zijiang | 07/27/04
|

"Many eyes" argument a bit over hyped
betelgeuse68 | 07/27/04
|

many eyes did not inspect the security model
Harry Butts | 07/28/04
|
still beats IE by miles....
nikster | 07/27/04
|

Just wait
PmAc_z | 07/28/04
|
 
track record...
ryusen | 07/28/04
|
This actually shows 'many eyes' at work
Amberhawk | 07/28/04
|

Wrong
Loverock Davidson | 07/28/04
|
 
Need I remind you?
AbsolutelyNot | 07/28/04
|
  
I guess so
Loverock Davidson | 07/28/04
|
 
yes you are
ryusen | 07/28/04
|

re: your question
ryusen | 07/28/04
|
So, what's the score. About 6 to 44,258 ?
BitTwiddler | 07/28/04
|
Whew! Good thing it's not tied into the OS or anything!
Xunil_Sierutuf | 07/28/04
|
Mozilla to squash security bugs
Loverock Davidson | 07/28/04
|

Hey, That's completely Unfair
el1jones | 07/28/04
|
 
hell...
ryusen | 07/28/04
|

Used mainly on Windows
voska | 07/28/04
|

yeah, IE just puts old exploits back in..
Monkey_MCSE | 07/28/04
|
 
wasnt that
eLurker | 07/28/04
|
  
a couple had them yes
Monkey_MCSE | 07/28/04
|
   
actually, no
eLurker | 07/28/04
|
    
if you are talking abotu the "shell"
ryusen | 07/28/04
|
     
no
eLurker | 07/28/04
|

How about the 'other' side
AmusedAtItAll | 07/28/04
|
I'm not an MS Basher
skeptic tank | 07/28/04
|

You match the criteria.. now come over to the bash side!
Xunil_Sierutuf | 07/28/04
|
Any exploits of these vulns?
Eggs Ackley_z | 07/28/04
|
Astro boy takes to the SKY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
chiwawa | 07/28/04
|
Technically
skeptic tank | 07/28/04
|
Nice that it can affect without being OS reliant, really open
FilledOut | 07/28/04
|
Hey, don't leave out bashers from Apple
FilledOut | 07/28/04
|
It'll be fixed before MS fixes IE
CobraA1 | 07/28/04
|

Might want to read the headlines
nikoli | 07/30/04
|