On TechRepublic: 10 dying IT skills
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 26 of 44:
Next »
« Previous
Desktops, not servers
Every time (well, not every time, but work with me here:)) someone wants to debunk the larger target theory they point to the fact the vast majority of the servers on the internet are *nix based. What they don't consider is the vast majority of those servers are also run by people who know what they're doing and have them locked down, behind a firewall and patched. In other words, people who aren't a weak security link. Also, the vast majority of viruses are transmitted via email. How many of those admins read email on the server and how many of those are going to be the idiot user who would open an unknown attachment?

It's the desktop that's the primary spreader of viruses. What I would like to see is someone come up with an algorithm that would show what sort of critical mass would be required for a virus to spread. I personally believe that the primary reason we see Windows viruses is because they occupy 95% of the desktops. For a virus to successfully spread there has to be enough infectable systems in contact with it. By infectable, I mean system with the proper OS and dumb enough users that would open the attachment and infect themselves. For the moment I believe Linux has a significant advantage regarding the CPU/IQ ratio. Well, maybe not IQ but at least computer skills. wink

I look forward to the day when Linux has a significant portion of the desktops and has a critical mass of uneducated users. Then, and only then, will we be able to tell if the larger target theory is real.
Posted by: PA-ITGuy   Posted on: 07/22/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Playing down Microsoft deficiencies  whisperycat | 07/22/04
ha!  PmAc_z | 07/22/04
You are part of the problem.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 07/22/04
OS's  richhayes | 07/22/04
No, you are wrong  whisperycat | 07/22/04
You are, only partially...  SC-man | 07/22/04
Ok, but ...  whisperycat | 07/22/04
Does MS have a monopoly or not?  vferrara | 07/22/04
?  whisperycat | 07/22/04
To Jellyclock  Qbt | 07/22/04
PeterWeter  SC-man | 07/22/04
Stupid Users  vferrara | 07/22/04
Jelly shows his ignorance  toadlife | 07/22/04
Wrong  richhayes | 07/22/04
REAL old!  SC-man | 07/22/04
Old?  AbsolutelyNot | 07/22/04
IBM  richhayes | 07/22/04
The TRS-80 !  SC-man | 07/23/04
Sorry, but that's just ignorant.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 07/22/04
Only 3 years?  richhayes | 07/23/04
Virus  SC-man | 07/23/04
But then tell me why  Qbt | 07/22/04
Peter Weter  whisperycat | 07/22/04
I guess...  Qbt | 07/22/04
You want a big target?  Linux User 147560 | 07/22/04
Desktops, not servers  PA-ITGuy | 07/22/04
Food for thought? You're the one who needs to think.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 07/22/04
#1 problem is user apathy  betelgeuse68 | 07/22/04
Who cares???  SC-man | 07/22/04
No  Linux User 147560 | 07/22/04
What!? Me worry?  SC-man | 07/22/04
LOL  Linux User 147560 | 07/22/04
MANY EMPLOYEES JUST DON'T CARE  itanalyst | 07/22/04
I care!  Bill4 | 07/22/04
I fully agree, just yesterday a user called me.  Monkey_MCSE | 07/22/04
Motivation is ALWAYS managements responsibility.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/22/04
Protecting the network is ITs responsibility.  middle of nowhere | 07/22/04
Oh PULEASE, take the silly rant elsewhere.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/22/04
People are NOT the weakest link anymore.  Eggs Ackley_z | 07/22/04
Sorry, but the human has ALWAYS been the weakest link.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/22/04
Again...  Linux User 147560 | 07/22/04
ROFLMAO  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/22/04
FINALLY someone is catching on...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/22/04
Motivation and Security is Everyone's responsibility  tranjaime | 07/27/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

SmartPlanet

Click Here