On GameSpot: Handheld Xbox coming...eventually.
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 5 of 14:
Next »
« Previous
Analysing these arguments...
>>we have been going to polls for
>>YEARS, and now people are too lazy.

-Example of overgeneralisation. True, some people are lazy--but the context in which "lazy" is used remains undefined. To help the reader understand more clearly, please clarify your argument by describing what "lazy" implies.

Also what is meant by the term "people"? ...Possibly "everyone in general", "working individuals", "retirees", single and/or retired parents", "natural-born citizens", etc.? The context used is unclear by your statement, and can seem ambiguous for the reader.... If by chance you're implying "people in general", this seems to be a difficult claim to prove. Tangible, empirical evidence would surely support your argument better.

>>To bad, if you can't go to the poll then stay >>home.

--False dilemma fallacy.
Posted by: Carl Rogers   Posted on: 07/07/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Computers + Voting = Ralph Nader Domination  chrislovesdana | 07/07/04
I agree  rapson | 07/07/04
Time to Embrace Paper Audit Trails?  Nigel Johnstone | 07/07/04
NO E-Voting, go to the polls  Enterprise Analyst. | 07/07/04
Analysing these arguments...  Carl Rogers | 07/07/04
VOTE NO on E-voting  Enterprise Analyst. | 07/07/04
um...  zijiang | 07/07/04
umm....  Enterprise Analyst. | 07/07/04
Voting at polls  richhayes | 07/08/04
I actually agree with you, but for different reasons.  Michael Kelly | 07/08/04
paper trail was the only way to double check  V Sanders | 07/07/04
I would also require a phone connection  V Sanders | 07/07/04
Do modems still exist?  Michael Kelly | 07/08/04
What say it ain't so  Squawkbox | 07/08/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here