On mySimon: Bare Escentuals Sweet Obsession
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 7 of 14:
Next »
« Previous
Solving this is simple
If they use the silly machine to provide 'probable cause' for a blood test, then use the blood test as evidence - there IS no problem. In most places I am familiar with, you have the right to DEMAND a blood test. Obviously you are more likely to do this if you're pretty sure you're NOT in violation of the law....

If the code is doing so little (because it is only a measuring device) then why would they fear disclosing it? Does it have 'result back doors' in it for instance? (that would be a popular feature with some forces, I'm sure).

Anyway - for legal purposes these field test machines are not really adequately accurate - although they are a good 'pre-screen'.
Posted by: Freebird54   Posted on: 08/14/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Better  Jack-Booted EULA | 08/10/07
The Comparison is Apt  Leria | 08/11/07
Completely incorrect comparison  frgough | 08/13/07
HUH?  W.E. | 08/13/07
Sorry, but that isn't enough  LostViking | 08/13/07
Remember states  Boot_Agnostic | 08/11/07
Solving this is simple  Freebird54 | 08/14/07
Completely asinine  frgough | 08/13/07
Who Tests?  kyron.gustafson@... | 08/13/07
Tests?  sysop-dr | 08/13/07
Analysis...  jasonp@... | 08/13/07
Where's the blood sample  voska | 08/13/07
It's bs anyway  Protector | 08/13/07
Asine is that the code is hidden  Boot_Agnostic | 08/13/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More