On GameFAQs: The top 10 forgotten RPGs
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 22 of 37:
Next »
« Previous
*sigh*
"Sure can. I've gone from OS X 10.0 all the way up to OS X 10.3.4 and have installed and updated gobs of third party software and have never, and that is NEVER, logged in as anything but a user."
The update manager (or whatever it is called in OSX) is most certainly a daemon that runs as root, and is programmed to allow normal users to interact with it. This 'functionality' could be considered a security hazard. I wonder- can this feature be turned off? This functionality exists in Windows 2000/XP/2003 too, but it must be set up by an administrator.


"That little step right there is why virus don't propogate on the Mac. You have to go through steps to get software on the machine, namely type in your password. So, I go to the offending website or get the offending program e-mailed to me. I have to actively download the program or save it from the e-mail. Then, double click on the installer icon, then enter mypassword. Only then will the software install."

You must have misread my last post. The behavior you are describing it identical in Windows for non-administrative accounts.

Let me spell it out for you as clearly as I can:

When a normal user in Windows trys to execute a program that requires access to any area outside of that users profile, the program will either fail or prompt the user for the credentials of an administrative account.

In Windows, by default, normal users have read-only access to virtually every part of the system, except of course, their own profile.


The problem with Windows is not so much it's security apparatus, but the default implimetation of that apparatus. I was never arguing that Windows comes set up incorrectly. I was arguing against the assumption that Windows lacks the ability to be secured.
Posted by: toadlife   Posted on: 06/03/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Only ZDNet could make a stellar record look  mlindl | 06/03/04
Salespeople  JustMe99_z | 06/03/04
Perhaps...but they DO bring in the Angry Masses who did  Laff | 06/03/04
Oh really  agottschald | 06/03/04
Naw you are not in a bad mood  Squawkbox | 06/03/04
Priceless  Jeff Spicoli | 06/03/04
One of the problems with being "Gifted" is that  Laff | 06/03/04
Another problem  tic swayback | 06/03/04
and another problem  stephen732@... | 06/03/04
Another problem with gifted people is  voska | 06/03/04
apple's lacking...  ryusen | 06/03/04
give me a break  Stuka | 06/03/04
Arguable  rkadowns | 06/03/04
Really quiet in here.........  middle of nowhere | 06/03/04
Huh?!? Snort - sorry...  Confused by religion | 06/03/04
"Mac-centered mass-mailing worm"?  pjstrupp | 06/03/04
Mixing FUD in with valid arguments.  toadlife | 06/03/04
Yeah sure!  Richard Flude | 06/03/04
Even More FUD  toadlife | 06/03/04
Even More FUD - Repost with proper formatting happy  toadlife | 06/03/04
Yup  MonsterPuppy | 06/03/04
*sigh*  toadlife | 06/03/04
Sigh, Back  MonsterPuppy | 06/04/04
valid question  toadlife | 06/04/04
Say what?  Richard Flude | 06/03/04
.  toadlife | 06/03/04
There's a difference between admin and root  olePigeon | 06/03/04
ugh!  toadlife | 06/03/04
Regarding this whole security discussion...  pjstrupp | 06/07/04
Apple any you there?  Richard Flude | 06/03/04
In the way of security battle...  compass53@... | 06/03/04
You've got the guts to say it  mlindl | 06/04/04
Apple Security Updates  powercat | 06/03/04
Message has been deleted.  please ignore my post | 06/03/04
(NT)ZDNet should sue you for repeated spamming  toadlife | 06/04/04
The more you spam  LongShipUser | 06/04/04
5% of market but 12% of connected capacity  dabunting | 06/07/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc