On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 33 of 55:
Next »
« Previous
No skill, waiting for 64-bit Linux threats
now those are more crafty and skilled. Ppl just sitting on them for a big release or what.
Posted by: FilledOut   Posted on: 05/27/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Well, there goes the M$hill theory of "most popular=most attacked"  Xunil_Sierutuf | 05/27/04
Shows what you know!  ShadeTree | 05/27/04
May or may not be true but  Linux User 147560 | 05/27/04
Here's a thought  Phil Nospam | 05/27/04
PhilN, that's a far reaching thought  stephen732@... | 05/27/04
Simple  PA-ITGuy | 05/28/04
Not quite...  techboy_z | 05/28/04
Re: Not quite...  PA-ITGuy | 05/28/04
Windows programmers...  bjbrock | 05/28/04
Aboslutely True  ShadeTree | 05/28/04
True  Suicida| | 05/28/04
It is most popular  ITsucks | 05/27/04
easy  zijiang | 05/27/04
Was That Common Sense???  nikoli | 05/27/04
Easy ...  Ardian Daka | 05/28/04
Curious  vferrara | 05/27/04
Re-Read the article  DragonBRockin | 05/27/04
psst!  stephen732@... | 05/27/04
Puma my point is...  DragonBRockin | 05/28/04
So release first?  AvdHarg | 05/28/04
Uh...NO!  DragonBRockin | 05/28/04
This has to be....  ShadeTree | 05/27/04
Hahahah  nucrash | 05/27/04
IA64 not x86_64  Robert Crocker | 05/27/04
Blast, I didn't catch the IA64  nucrash | 05/28/04
Beta??  richdave | 05/27/04
Corrections  nucrash | 05/28/04
64-bitness  ma.rk | 05/28/04
I am the guy...  ShadeTree | 05/28/04
(NT)Or he might just work for a company that uses IA64 servers  toadlife | 05/27/04
I think Symantec wrote it!  Phil Nospam | 05/27/04
at least somebody caught that  neil ubich | 05/28/04
No skill, waiting for 64-bit Linux threats  FilledOut | 05/27/04
Keeping them for later  nucrash | 05/27/04
(NT)People that can program in IA64 assembly code have 'no skill'?  toadlife | 05/27/04
Have skills, but how much is necessary to attack Windows  FilledOut | 05/28/04
What is the vulnerability?  rapson | 05/27/04
There is none  toadlife | 05/27/04
W64.Rugrat.3344 details  B.O.F.H. | 05/27/04
Flaw in article  rpmyers1 | 05/27/04
if you want to nitpick  toadlife | 05/27/04
Beta virus  Anton Philidor | 05/27/04
Not a Beta Virus  ShadeTree | 05/28/04
Might want to squirrel those away  FilledOut | 05/27/04
There are none.  richdave | 05/27/04
With  michael-t | 05/27/04
MS has already too many vunerbilities  Ope | 05/28/04
well  Suicida| | 05/28/04
I don't get it  PA-ITGuy | 05/28/04
here you go  Suicida| | 05/28/04
Starting Early  xero11 | 05/28/04
Sorry, Bad Link . . .  xero11 | 05/28/04
How many?  gmyx | 05/28/04
Most of them  neil ubich | 05/28/04
Well, well, well....  Hard Cider | 05/30/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement