On TV.com: 5 TV shows that would make GREAT MOVIES
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 7 of 11:
Next »
« Previous
Removing Norton
I'd have to disagree. Norton 2007 may not be a RAM hog compared to earlier versions but still took way too much of my son's system's RAM and CPU cycles before we removed it and went with Kaspersky. Much less of a footprint for memory and CPU cycles. He appreciates the speedier updates which are important to him since he receives many messages/files from Asian contacts as part of his job function and many of those contacts don't seem to realize their computers are supporting healthy virus colonies.

The one time (so far) he had an issue, Kaspersky's tech support identified the issue and walked him through the fix. The last issue we had with Norton, it took several calls before they would even admit that a problem might exist and if it actually existed, it might be due to their software.
Posted by: DNSB   Posted on: 05/26/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Told ya so!  Confused by religion | 05/24/07
Bloatware  Mr Roboto | 05/24/07
Symantec is junk  skeptic tank | 05/24/07
People still use symantec?  kraterz | 05/24/07
Totally agree!  MGP2 | 05/25/07
Removing Norton  bluelinex@... | 05/26/07
Removing Norton  DNSB | 05/26/07
Norton AV is Bad 4 U  jwinkler2083233 | 05/25/07
even an idiot can make a good point  jymbolia | 05/25/07
EULA protection?  DNSB | 05/26/07
No matter how you slice it, Symantec just plain sucks...  shawkins | 05/27/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

SmartPlanet

Click Here