On TechRepublic: Windows 7 report card: Hits and misses
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 6:
Next »
Hmm ... how does CPU detect a buffer over run?
doesn't make much sense. The programmer would need to strongly type the code, the compiler would need to type safe the calls, the linker would need to tage the object code for the CPU to know when a buffer was being over run. I can see how this could be done going forward, but how the heck does it work with legacy code?

Is this another MS effort to obsuce the real issue?

Strongly typed languages with well written code don't have buffer over runs.

So, how does the CPU protect us from the bad code which does?
Posted by: oldskool   Posted on: 05/17/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Hmm ... how does CPU detect a buffer over run?  oldskool | 05/17/04
Re: Hmm...  cuervo_z | 05/17/04
It doesn't protect buffer overflows, just payloads  bluefoxicy | 07/17/04
DRM anyone?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/17/04
or... PalldiumII: sneaking it under the consumers' nose?  ryusen | 05/17/04
I have this feature already- I "executed" my Windows CD  Xunil_Sierutuf | 05/18/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline