Canada, Mexico travel cards under privacy attack

TalkBack 7 of 10:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

A one way ticket to slavery...?!

To tag people with RFID passport ID cards (travel papers) presumes:

1. The people are the property of a master.
2. Some say or infer a master-slave relationship exists (not so different a scenario
to that of a farmer RFID tagging cattle),
3. And that the so-called masters utilise a scenario-set to attempt to persuade the
fearful to accept a mark of the presumed master-slave relationship...

To quote Ari Schwartz from the article,

"The only positive thing that could possibly be said about the pass cards is that it
is a voluntary system," he said.

unquote

Voluntary? For how long? Until the next 'terrorist incident'?

4. Sadly, that is the supposed (recent) rationale for imposing such draconian
measures as RFID tagging a population.

The WTC 911 incident, 'terrorism', et al was manufactured by the very people (or
their allies) now promoting, introducing or insisting such enslavement devices be
implemented.

5. The U.S. government is, effectively, against you. It will do anything (from
orchestrating terror incidents globally, devising the obligatory war against terror
(and waking-up a perceived sleeping enemy), to terrorising you and yours into
accepting slavery and rejecting freedom) to re-engineer society to accept a
totalitarian dictatorial regime.

The first DVD to watch is "Martial Law 911: Rise of the Police State" by Alex Jones.
Visit http://www.infowars.com/martial_law_911.htm and

The second DVD is by Aaron Russo (film maker and producer) "America: Freedom
to Fascism" Visit http://www.freedomtofascism.com/ or read Aaron's bio at
http://www.freedomtofascism.com/about_aaron/about_aaron.html

It's not a pretty picture, but the picture gets bigger...

6. Apparently, "...the UNITED STATES corporation was registered in England as a
corporation by [a] (Presidential) Legislative Act in 1871 - 41st Congress, Session
III, Chapter 62, page 419."

http://www.brumbywatchaustralia.com/Principality01.htm

7. So if the international bankers 'own' the U.S. (as a corporation since 1871, i.e.,
it is no longer a 'sovereign' country), then it is conceivable the bankers would want
'collateral' for the loans the 'government' borrows to pay for the services many
imagine taxes fund.

8. The taxes merely pay the interest on those loans. Which explains why 'national'
and 'state' debt keeps increasing. Because the principals (of loans) are rarely
repaid.

See Aaron Russo's DVD, "America: Freedom to Fascism" for details, including the
fact that wage and salary earners in the U.S. are not legally obliged to pay income
tax (there is NO law requiring you to file or pay income tax).

Watch the DVD and see for yourself the story of Whitey Harrell's win in court. Juror
Marcy Brooks explains it well. Download her audio interview (Pt. 1 & 2) on The
Peter Mac Show @ http://www.petermacshow.com/content/view/165/34/

9. At least one report puts a monetary value on males and females (as a so-called
master would likely value so-called slaves).

To quote Toikka and Neveu (The expected lifetime earnings of children in the
UNITED STATES):

We estimated that on average a child who was 3 years old in 2000 could expect to
have future discounted lifetime money earnings of $464,197, and future lifetime
discounted total compensation of $660,552.

unquote

www.ced.org/docs/report/report_ivk_toikka_2004.pdf

10. So if you think you have no real freedom of choice, if you are compelled by an
inequitable contract or unconstitutional law, then you are behaving like a slave.

To quote Mary Croft:

Never sign any contract unless you agree completely with the terms and
conditions therein.

One question on this contract one signs when he registers for the draft is: Are you
a US Citizen? What this question really means is: ?Are you a 14th Amendment
Citizen? - in which case you are a government created, fictional, corporate entity
and hence will do as we say? - as opposed to: ?Are you an American
National/American Sovereign? - in which case all your rights are reserved not only
in common law but also in commerce?.

War IS Commerce. If you were to answer ?No? to that question, you would not be
drafted. You, as sovereign, are always free to volunteer, but only 14th Amendment
Citizens can be drafted.

They are required to do what they are told to do. Why do you think the US wants
the illegal aliens, in fact, everyone, to get a driver?s licence /voter?s registration
card? They are contracts to become US Citizens who immediately lose any
freedoms and rights they would otherwise have had as sovereign Americans.

If you don?t want to go to war - and who would, knowing what that private,
belligerent, foreign corporation, known as the USG, has in store for anyone who
signs up? - then don?t sign the contract, the terms of which are not to your liking.

Under Article 1 ?10 of the Constitution, you have the right to contract
and the right NOT to contract. The entire matter becomes very simple when you
remember who you are.

Those who go to war are each insured for 10 million dollars. The beneficiary is the
USA. Family members get $600,000. The more soldiers who die, the richer
become the Feds.

unquote

www.natural-person.ca/pdf/mary_croft.pdf

11. Mary discusses (in more detail) how your 'birth certificate' actually certifies the
creation of a government controlled corporation in your name (in all capitals).
Read this over to appreciate its import.

So it is conceivable that your government created 'corporation' is also collateral for
the bankers and subject to government dictates ('law').

12. There is a significant set of problems to face. For many people have yet to
realise that the so-called 'left' and 'right' political wings are joined to the same
bird.

Christopher Howard is Professor of Government at the College of William and
Mary, and he notes in his article 'American Socialism for the Already Rich':

The more interesting and salient question is why Republicans cooperate. Although
Democrats have been instrumental in enacting these programs, they could not
have succeeded without Republican support.

http://www.alternet.org/workplace/49768/

And ideologically, the 'left' and 'right' actually have more in common than not.

"The only difference between the Republican and Democratic parties is the
velocities with which their knees hit the floor when corporations knock on their
door."
-- Ralph Nader

Essentially, the 'left' and the 'right' are parties that support and implement (to
varying degrees) socialist policies and practices. Indeed, to quote Lenin:

?But is the existence of a socialist republic in a capitalist environment at all
conceivable?? Lenin asked again. ?From the political and military aspects it seemed
inconceivable. That it is possible, both politically and militarily, has now been
proved. It is a fact.?

http://www.marxists.org/history/etol/critiques/guardian/pt03.htm

Socialism tends to develop into communism (even in a capitalist environment),
and in all cases free speech is sooner or later viewed as a danger to the so-called
elite and their 'control' of the system of order.

In 'None Dare Call It Conspiracy', Gary Allen explains:

"Socialism is usually defined as government ownership and/ or control over the
basic means of production and distribution of goods and services. When analyzed
this means government control over everything, including you.

"All controls are "people" controls. If the government controls these areas it can
eventually do just exactly as Marx set out to do--destroy the right to private
property, eliminate the family and wipe out religion."

The true political spectrum would have total government (dictatorship) on the left
(including Communism, Fascism, Nazism, Socialism, Pharaohism, and Caesarism);
on the right would be anarchy, or 'no government', with limited constitutional
government (like the original U.S. Republic) sitting somewhere between the
dictatorships, and anarchy or 'no government'.

13. A further issue that needs to be considered is the outcome of open
identification. Relative recent history bodes ill on a number of counts:

Hollerith (of IBM)....

"The new revelation of IBM technology in the Auschwitz area constitutes the final
link in the chain of documentation surrounding Big Blue's vast enterprise in Nazi-
occupied Poland, supervised at first directly from its New York headquarters, and
later through its Geneva office."

http://www.ibmandtheholocaust.com/articles/auschwitz.html

14. Land of the 'Free'? I can feel a 'rewrite' of those words coming on. Unless, of
course, the people choose 'Freedom'.

Posted by: smdunn   Posted on: 04/24/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• The True Costs of Virtual Server Solutions VMware In an economic environment that is repeatedly heralding the message "do ... Download Now
• Why Isn't Server Virtualization Saving Us More? A Few Small Changes May Dramatically Increase Your Efficiency VMware Companies have rapidly adopted server virtualization over the past few ... Download Now
• VMware Infrastructure: A Guide to Bottom-Line Benefits VMware Frustrated by the costs of maintain ever larger data centers?or building ... Download Now