On TV.com: SUPERNATURAL Breaks with a Bang
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 1:
Have to comment
If your security does not create the privacy necesary for comunicative curcumstance,but rather intreagues security proffesionals that 'to colaborate is to be monitored,it cannot BE security.

By appropriating 'monitor to the system,it is only vindicating what security is suppose to prevent in the first place - back doors on communication(s).

Idea being you need applications that are not-volatile to the network. That is domicile to attack from viruses. Performance in communicative programs with features that equate to 'what you want of them.

These applications can detail a fairly tricky business plan. But the privacy of your associatiates should be a trait of its security. Not the exposure in the course of security - the other way around.

Its worth thinking about. Performance,privacy,security,non-volatility to the network. And features,communicative features .Did I say that.Audio,Visual,Data.

Of course this depends a lot on your environment. But R&D that works on the security with privacy will go a lot farther than security that creates back doors,and continues to do so.

.just talking.
Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 05/10/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Have to comment  ParadigmOdyssey | 05/10/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc