Safely running 2.0.0.2 here
galileon | 03/06/07
|

Same here, and I didn't have to wait a month for the fix! (nt)
CobraA1 | 03/06/07
|
 
No you waited almost three months.
ShadeTree | 03/07/07
|
  
re: No you waited almost three months.
johnay | 03/10/07
|
Title is a bit misleading
NetArch. | 03/06/07
|

So then if it was never found
John Zern | 03/06/07
|
Flaw in the fix?
pa2004 | 03/06/07
|

ALREADY FIXED!!!!!!!!!!!!
galileon | 03/06/07
|
 
How long did they know about it
John Zern | 03/06/07
|
  
oh sure!! Just one little problem with your logic.
mdsmedia | 03/06/07
|

Um, excuse me
HouseOfZen | 03/06/07
|
There have been so many
xuniL_z | 03/06/07
|

do you know the difference between Firefox and Linux?
mdsmedia | 03/06/07
|
 
No - this was just his chance to trash talk
jacarter3 | 03/06/07
|
  
yeah, I knew that, but I was trying to be polite
mdsmedia | 03/06/07
|
Well, it's Mozilla, so its fixed or quickly so
Boot_Agnostic | 03/06/07
|
Patching the patch...
PB_z | 03/06/07
|
This ain't news, it's history.
javarunner | 03/06/07
|

It wasn't released till Monday
ShadeTree | 03/07/07
|
Not News
bob in FL | 03/07/07
|
run the current version, silly users
corticus | 03/07/07
|
The future promises that flaws will be found
Boot_Agnostic | 03/07/07
|