On mySimon: Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 6 of 41:
Next »
« Previous
Yes and no
The process used to browse the internet on Windows is 100% in user mode. You can kill the iexplore.exe process from within Task Manager, and it will end your browse session, but it won't affect any other part of the system. Even if IE crashes it does not affect any other part of the system.

That does not mean that any other part of the OS does not use the same libraries that IE uses. It does. It is just that you could have different processes using the same DLLs, but those processes are isolated from each other just as much as two completely different apps would be, using different DLLs. For instance, if I run two instances of IE, one as admin, the other as a non-admin user, then if the non-admin version gets compromised due to some flaw, the flaw is still isolated to the non-admin user (unless it is a privilege escalation flaw, but that is another story).

The problem is that if you discover a flaw in IE, it is likely that the same flaw exists in the rendering components that the OS use (since it really is the same thing). It is a find-it-in-the-browser, find-it-in-the-OS kind of situation. That is the bad part. The good part is that it is still different processes with the same process/security isolation between them you would get with any other two processes.
Posted by: Qbt   Posted on: 10/26/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Well...  Qbt | 10/25/06
I agree....  andrej770 | 10/26/06
Oh! Isn't it wonderful  gsuser | 10/26/06
Experience counts  critic-at-arms | 10/26/06
Are they really the same?  MMs13s | 10/26/06
Yes and no  Qbt | 10/26/06
Great - I think...  MMs13s | 10/26/06
To expand  Qbt | 10/26/06
An exploit in FF can cause just as much damage as one in IE  PB_z | 10/26/06
To ensure clarity  Linux User 147560 | 10/26/06
To ensure clarity  Linux User 147560 | 10/26/06
Users are restricted from modified the core system files in Windows, too  PB_z | 10/27/06
Uh...  zoroaster | 10/26/06
I was about to say something like...  3D0G | 10/26/06
I agree  April May | 10/26/06
Well  Linux User 147560 | 10/26/06
pssstt.....  Shelendrea | 10/26/06
Got a ??? for you...  Linux User 147560 | 10/26/06
Not lately  Shelendrea | 10/26/06
Yeah...  Linux User 147560 | 10/26/06
Well duh  Shelendrea | 10/26/06
I don't know what disturbs me more  Shelendrea | 10/26/06
Not one bug but two ....  ShadeTree | 10/26/06
I saw that  Shelendrea | 10/26/06
You are entitled to that opinion.  ShadeTree | 10/26/06
FF2 Vs IECrud7  jackofalltradesmasterofnone | 10/26/06
Wrong, Linux.  tealcat | 10/30/06
Logic?  blackgaff | 10/27/06
FF 2 Rocks  Chad_z | 10/26/06
Chad_zzzzzzzzzzzzz  jguyp725@... | 10/26/06
I don't really like how Window Snyder sounds  duswil | 10/26/06
yup...  zoroaster | 10/26/06
Bravo  kd5djn | 10/26/06
Firefox?All Editions  Kris Kleeberg | 10/26/06
"There is a crash, but it is a denial of service"  PB_z | 10/26/06
Firefox 2  mikemerch@... | 10/26/06
Firefox problems?  John_Carter | 10/30/06
I found one bug...easily fixed  snow_wolf36@... | 10/30/06
Firefox 2  lewcock@... | 10/31/06
Re:Firefox 2  filrod@... | 10/31/06
StanW  null | 12/01/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

SmartPlanet

Click Here