On CBS.com: Watch Letterman's Top 10 at cbs.com
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 41:
Next »
Well...
It looks to me, after Mozilla "rebuts" these flaws, that they (or at least one of the flaws) are not any less severe than the IE7 vulnerability. Which, btw, for some reason does not appear to affect my IE7 on XP system. When I click on the "proof" on Secunia's site, I simply get a new tab with a link clearly showing the fully spoofed address, so I don't know what the big deal is. Supposedly there should be a popup (instead of a new tab) that is positioned just so that it partially covers up the address field. Not quite sure how something like that can grab headlines here on ZDNet but then again I guess it is important to ZDNet to push that "MS is teh suxorz" agenda of theirs, so there you go.

Anyway, Secunia's rating for the IE7 vulnerability is "less critical", their second lowest rating. I don't think anyone that has a clue will think that it is any more serious than the FF vulnerability. Even after Mozilla did their damage control PR. A crash (as in the FF vulnerability) should be automatically considered a high security risk because hackers can often find ways to cause arbitrary code to execute once they can reproduce a crash (hacking 101). But I am sure that won't stop the hordes of ZDNet posters from telling us just how much more "vulnerable" IE7 is compared to FF 2.0 based on these recent vulnerabilities.

At least it seems as if *both* browsers are being scrutinized.
Posted by: Qbt   Posted on: 10/25/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Well...  Qbt | 10/25/06
I agree....  andrej770 | 10/26/06
Oh! Isn't it wonderful  gsuser | 10/26/06
Experience counts  critic-at-arms | 10/26/06
Are they really the same?  MMs13s | 10/26/06
Yes and no  Qbt | 10/26/06
Great - I think...  MMs13s | 10/26/06
To expand  Qbt | 10/26/06
An exploit in FF can cause just as much damage as one in IE  PB_z | 10/26/06
To ensure clarity  Linux User 147560 | 10/26/06
To ensure clarity  Linux User 147560 | 10/26/06
Users are restricted from modified the core system files in Windows, too  PB_z | 10/27/06
Uh...  zoroaster | 10/26/06
I was about to say something like...  3D0G | 10/26/06
I agree  April May | 10/26/06
Well  Linux User 147560 | 10/26/06
pssstt.....  Shelendrea | 10/26/06
Got a ??? for you...  Linux User 147560 | 10/26/06
Not lately  Shelendrea | 10/26/06
Yeah...  Linux User 147560 | 10/26/06
Well duh  Shelendrea | 10/26/06
I don't know what disturbs me more  Shelendrea | 10/26/06
Not one bug but two ....  ShadeTree | 10/26/06
I saw that  Shelendrea | 10/26/06
You are entitled to that opinion.  ShadeTree | 10/26/06
FF2 Vs IECrud7  jackofalltradesmasterofnone | 10/26/06
Wrong, Linux.  tealcat | 10/30/06
Logic?  blackgaff | 10/27/06
FF 2 Rocks  Chad_z | 10/26/06
Chad_zzzzzzzzzzzzz  jguyp725@... | 10/26/06
I don't really like how Window Snyder sounds  duswil | 10/26/06
yup...  zoroaster | 10/26/06
Bravo  kd5djn | 10/26/06
Firefox?All Editions  Kris Kleeberg | 10/26/06
"There is a crash, but it is a denial of service"  PB_z | 10/26/06
Firefox 2  mikemerch@... | 10/26/06
Firefox problems?  John_Carter | 10/30/06
I found one bug...easily fixed  snow_wolf36@... | 10/30/06
Firefox 2  lewcock@... | 10/31/06
Re:Firefox 2  filrod@... | 10/31/06
StanW  null | 12/01/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More