On CBS MoneyWatch: Dumbest Things You Do With Money
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 9 of 10:
Next »
« Previous
you usually need to show "damages"
...unless you can make a strong case for punitive damages.

If you wish to sue someone (and reasonably win), you should present a case where you can show actual past, present, or future damages. Damages could include lost past, present, or future incomel. They could be loss of future use, loss of past, current, & future reputation, loss of affection, loss of rights, visitation, treatment options, etc. The damages can be tangible or intangible...but you should somehow show how you were damaged so that the court can "make you whole" again.

So, if in a public forum, I say something like: "Rrushi1, you ignorant twit" you can certainly sue me all you like. But you probably won't get anything unless you can show how you lost something (affection, standing, income) or were somehow else damaged in the process.

The risk you personally run is that your attorney can milk you for fees. The risk the attorney runs is that he/she can also be found by the court to have brought forth a case that was inactionable & an abuse of process. According to Rule 11, the attorney bringing forth the suit can be fined or sanctioned. Evidently the court didn't find the attorney to be at fault enough to be sanctioned, but this doesn't mean they weren't. In some sense, they were at some type of fault...after all, they lost the case up to this point...subject to appeal.
Posted by:   Posted on: 10/12/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Message has been deleted.  opensourcepro | 10/12/06
This is exactly why it will only get worse...  BitTwiddler | 10/12/06
No worries Congress will stick up for us  Chad_z | 10/12/06
I know this is hard to understand  frgough | 10/12/06
Sure it is,  bjbrock | 10/12/06
Another Idiot Judge...  IT_Guy_z | 10/12/06
No, the fault lies with the plaitiff's lawyers  jimbo_z | 10/12/06
Something is not quite right here  Rrushi1 | 10/12/06
you usually need to show "damages"   | 10/12/06
Are hackers off the hook now?  Lcbrizdn | 10/12/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More