Microsoft, Time Warner take DRM stake

TalkBack 1 of 1:

• Thread View
• Flat View

Do You Really Need A

comment here . 'Content Guard,as well as the present day DRM is cohesively flawed. On two basic parts.

A.The environment of wich the digital works reside.

B. The premise of wich DRM is suppose to operate.


_________

For A. .. it can be continued that DRM is 'master of all roles within its emplemintation by those supposing to have a 'product developed that is usable on the open market. The claim that the DRM is workable for 'security purposes on the proposition of 'authors affect may be well intentioned. But those same authors may not be aware that the programs wich should exhibit performance on the consumer end actually do not convey the utility of wich the consumer may find necesary within this environment.

B. ..it is easily said that Microsoft,and Time-warner has something to do with DRM. It is much more admirable to denote exactly what performance of a product is expected of both authors,and consumers alike in a way that is relevent to both within its environment of mention. Within most estates of DRM - these relationships are :
_ purposely left due to the duel roles the security of the work is said to have,

_and the role of wich a consumer can expect performance of a product.

This is usually demonstrated via a 'liscence arrangement in wich the premise of the 'drm is incorrectly stated as that in the same as the performance of a product a consumer should expect. While it is true there will be several myriad types of products to be known,these should not be purposly devoid the relationship of the envronment of its use,and the persons expectation of them.


I could note another. One in wich a public notification is said to have taken place for a product. This product is said to improve the aspect of the person of consumer utilizing it. However it does not do anything besides denote the premise of the DRM,rather than the performance of the product of wich its public notice should be stated of.

Another thing. It might be considered that EULAs ARE PUBLIC NOTICE. Something to consider of the affunideous. Since the purpose of them may be exposed in such a way that the public could truly recognize the relationship of wich monopoly operates,and that of wich competition is said to actually be taken place.

A publication of an EULA might be considered by a court to be perfectly well done practice. Since it is said that the privy respect is something that should be considered part of a product wich assumes itself to be within performing mention of commerce.

If it was that consumers and authors alike would read some of these EULA they would find the commodity for wich is only an assumption (DRM),and product(consumer) should be something wich is relavently noted as being so.

-just talking.

Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 04/05/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• The True Costs of Virtual Server Solutions VMware In an economic environment that is repeatedly heralding the message "do ... Download Now
• Building the Virtualized Enterprise with VMware Iinfrastructure VMware VMware virtualization software has been adopted by over 120,000 enterprise ... Download Now
• Reducing Server Total Cost of Ownership with VMware Virtualization Software VMware VMware virtualization enables customers to reduce their server TCO and ... Download Now