On mySimon: Rite-Lite Super Bright LED Puck Lights
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 40 of 124:
Next »
« Previous
Umm actually
that's where OpenSuSE's AppArmor comes to play...

AppArmor Linux Application Security
Overview

As an open source offering from Novell, AppArmor Linux application security has no licensing fees. AppArmor is included in the SUSE Linux Enterprise 10 products and in openSUSE.
Novell now offers maintenance and support for AppArmor as you ensure its optimal implementation in your environment. You can access the world-class Novell support infrastructure 24x7x365; Novell support technicians are trained in AppArmor to ensure expertise in the technology.
Software flaws in complex applications open the way for attackers to compromise systems that host critical enterprise data. Perimeter security solves only part of the problem because global business requirements mandate open network access for mobile employees, customers and partners. Besides, firewalls do little to protect against the growing number of threats originating internally. IT organizations do much to keep their machines patched to protect against the latest threats, but this reactive security strategy still leaves businesses dangerously exposed. With experienced hackers becoming faster at exploiting vulnerabilities (zero-day attacks are increasingly common), businesses often have little or no time to download, test and apply patches to their systems.
Novell AppArmor is the most effective and easy-to-use Linux network application security system on the market. Novell AppArmor provides enterprise-class, host-intrusion prevention and protects the operating system and applications from the harmful side effects of internal or external attacks, malicious applications and viruses. As a result, businesses can protect mission-critical data, reduce system administration costs and ensure compliance with government regulations.
No Chinks in the Armor
Comprehensive enterprise-wide network application security requires attention to both users and applications. Novell is the only Linux vendor that provides market-leading identity-management solutions to protect data from unauthorized users and an enterprise Linux-application security solution to protect systems from applications whose flaws are exploited.
Unlike other application security solutions, AppArmor does not require heavy investments in training, resources or expertise. Rather, a comprehensive console and YaST-based toolset largely automate security-policy development. AppArmor tools identify the programs that need containment, capture application behavior in a "learning mode" and turn that behavior into security policy?all from a single graphical interface.
Simple to Use
Many network application security solutions never meet the purposes for which they were designed because they are too complex or require too much maintenance. AppArmor, on the other hand, is designed to get you started quickly with minimal investment in time and resources. Its name-based access-control method does not require relabeling of the file system as other methods do, and applications don't have to be modified to benefit from AppArmor protection. In addition, the default configuration of AppArmor includes a number of predefined profiles for common Linux programs like Web, e-mail and remote-login servers that can be deployed immediately. Security profiles for custom or third-party applications can be developed using the included wizard-based tools, which also make policy updates simple as your environment change.
Easy to Audit
AppArmor profiles completely define which system resources an application can access and with which privileges it can do so. Because they are written in standard UNIX syntax with no new jargon, the profiles can be audited quickly for the security implications of a profiled application. Further, AppArmor has built-in reporting capabilities so that system administrators can quickly view AppArmor related events, schedule reports and aggregate events from multiple systems into a common report.
Precise Controls
Many Web applications are written in interpreted scripting languages such as Perl, PHP or Python. AppArmor provides a powerful capability to confine individual Web applications even though they are executed inside Apache using modules such as mod_perl, mod_php or mod_python. AppArmor allows Apache to change context and apply a specific security profile to the script about to be executed. This tight confinement keeps individual scripts from tampering with the larger application, which typically has a wider set of privileges.
Prevents Emergencies
Because vulnerable software is the culprit in many network attacks, organizations spend considerable time and resources trying to keep their servers up-to-date with patches. However, frenzied patching is rarely a sound approach. The increasing occurrence of zero-day attacks means that exploits are often developed before patches become available, and the rush to patch may cause new problems with other software running on the system. AppArmor reduces urgent system patching by stopping attacks before they impact your system. Patching becomes a scheduled maintenance activity instead of an emergency, resulting in greater IT productivity.
No Licensing Fees
As an open source offering from Novell, AppArmor Linux application security has no licensing fees. AppArmor is included in the SUSE Linux Enterprise 10 products and in openSUSE.
Novell now offers maintenance and support for AppArmor as you ensure its optimal implementation in your environment. You can access the world-class Novell support infrastructure 24x7x365; Novell support technicians are trained in AppArmor to ensure expertise in the technology.

[url=http://www.novell.com/linux/security/apparmor/]Source[/url]

Thing is AppArmor can be used with the desktop, there are several of us here in this forum using it. Why pay for something we get with our OS in the first place? devil
Posted by: Linux User 147560   Posted on: 10/02/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

That undeniable scent of a lawsuit is unfurling here .  Intellihence | 10/02/06
hehe  galileon | 10/02/06
Why?  John Zern | 10/02/06
Did they come out ahead in  Jack-Booted EULA | 10/02/06
If its not NO AX ZERN ! - NT  raycote | 10/02/06
Why? Microsoft is right and  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/02/06
And in other news  zkiwi | 10/02/06
As if the EU mattered.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/03/06
MicroSoft_Ax_to_Grind & Grind & Grind & Grind...NT  raycote | 10/02/06
Another useless insight from Bitty.  thelemite | 10/03/06
Well, we can wait and see yes.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/03/06
Microsoft can't win...  Wolfie2K3 | 10/04/06
Hmm  rapson | 10/02/06
Hmm Indeed  Badgered | 10/02/06
inherent weakness  FADS_z | 10/02/06
And wouldn't they...  A.Sinic | 10/02/06
re: and wouldn't they  Badgered | 10/03/06
re: inherent weakness  Badgered | 10/03/06
Exactlly! (nt)  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/02/06
Well...  zkiwi | 10/02/06
Security thru obscurity is not....  thelemite | 10/03/06
It appears that crack us is still high in Redmond.  Suicida| | 10/02/06
Convenient Truth; Another Vista delay?  mighetto | 10/02/06
I suspect there's a lot more to this story....  rock06r | 10/02/06
You're missing it...  techboy_z | 10/02/06
They should make it work  voska | 10/02/06
Y'know . . .  jlhenry62 | 10/03/06
You might be right about ZA, but rumor has it...  rock06r | 10/03/06
McAfee should let M$ to crash and burn  Linux Geek | 10/02/06
So you agree!  smartyram | 10/02/06
Nice catch, smartyram  John Zern | 10/02/06
Argh!  zkiwi | 10/02/06
You can whine as you want.  Grayson Peddie | 10/02/06
Just in case...  zkiwi | 10/02/06
Not quite. My brain cell's still there.  Grayson Peddie | 10/02/06
if you're going to be such a baby..  Monkey_MCSE | 10/03/06
Good call!  Linux User 147560 | 10/03/06
So according to you  zkiwi | 10/02/06
It will never be 1/100th as bad as it is now  TripleII | 10/02/06
Umm actually  Linux User 147560 | 10/02/06
My point  TripleII | 10/02/06
McAfee has a Point.  savatar | 10/02/06
Point is, time moves on and things change.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/02/06
Microsft however is...  zkiwi | 10/02/06
No they aren't  A.Sinic | 10/02/06
Wow!  Linux User 147560 | 10/02/06
Typical Linux Penguin babble....  rock06r | 10/03/06
You need to  Linux User 147560 | 10/03/06
Erm...  zkiwi | 10/02/06
Again 1999 stuff....  rock06r | 10/03/06
They were still found to be a monopoly on appeal  zkiwi | 10/03/06
From Harvard law itself...  Linux User 147560 | 10/03/06
Do you think that means they can do nothing?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/03/06
Always?  Patrick Jones | 10/03/06
Could be done....  techboy_z | 10/03/06
Still don't see a problem.....  JoeMama_z | 10/02/06
Then you're blind  Fred Fredrickson | 10/03/06
no its not....  JoeMama_z | 10/03/06
In other news...  Spikey_Mike | 10/02/06
Yes, it does have. Maybe you have heard of tablets  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/02/06
Whether they NEED IT TO WORK  zkiwi | 10/02/06
Sorry, they developed the entire thing  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/02/06
You are still incapable  zkiwi | 10/02/06
No, you simply refuse to listen.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/03/06
So, the EU advice to Microsoft  zkiwi | 10/03/06
MS is right, they don't need to sell Vista in Europe.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/03/06
So they shouldn't have Keyboards either?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/02/06
Retard  zkiwi | 10/02/06
You obviously lack the ability to  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/03/06
So, what's your excuse then?  zkiwi | 10/03/06
You are the only one  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/03/06
hmm, no security is not a new market  NoThomas | 10/03/06
You're rehashing a failed argument  zkiwi | 10/03/06
Just NOT true... Mostly.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/02/06
This is a means to force the FTC & DOJ to do their job  BeGoneFool | 10/02/06
you're retarded...  JoeMama_z | 10/02/06
Once again ZDNet leaves out important details  PB_z | 10/02/06
Setting a precedent  whisperycat | 10/02/06
C'mon security vendors, please leave Microsoft alone!!!  Grayson Peddie | 10/02/06
Yeah right  zkiwi | 10/02/06
Hmm...maybe.  Grayson Peddie | 10/02/06
Oh?  zkiwi | 10/02/06
Yes, I know Microsoft enters the security market!  Grayson Peddie | 10/02/06
So...  zkiwi | 10/02/06
Hmm... Nice comments!  Grayson Peddie | 10/02/06
Well...  zkiwi | 10/02/06
I'm not smoking. You're the one.  Grayson Peddie | 10/02/06
Well...  zkiwi | 10/02/06
Wrong again.  Grayson Peddie | 10/02/06
Ok, so having reached this point  zkiwi | 10/02/06
zkiwi, I take it back  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/03/06
One has to stoop that low  zkiwi | 10/03/06
What ever you need to justify yourself...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/03/06
Whatever  zkiwi | 10/03/06
Partially Agree  TripleII | 10/02/06
Another whiner that doesn't have kernel access.  osreinstall | 10/02/06
Well...  zkiwi | 10/02/06
Well Well  osreinstall | 10/02/06
So...  zkiwi | 10/02/06
Get off the monopoly theme.  osreinstall | 10/02/06
So, you are denying  zkiwi | 10/02/06
No I am not but you are overlooking details.  osreinstall | 10/02/06
Assert away  zkiwi | 10/02/06
I shall  osreinstall | 10/02/06
Ok...  zkiwi | 10/02/06
Go read what Rob has to say about the AV industry.  osreinstall | 10/02/06
Of course  zkiwi | 10/03/06
More like this.  osreinstall | 10/03/06
Once again, Windows x64 does NOT have a monopoly!  PB_z | 10/02/06
Not only that  osreinstall | 10/02/06
One word for you...  zkiwi | 10/02/06
You still don't get it.  osreinstall | 10/02/06
And...  zkiwi | 10/03/06
And you are full of BS.  osreinstall | 10/03/06
So  zkiwi | 10/03/06
Are you quoting words I never spoke?  osreinstall | 10/03/06
Or, to put it another way -  whisperycat | 10/02/06
Why is Trend Micro fine with the new Security panel?  neutralworks | 10/02/06
MS, code your OS so AV is irrelevant  Boot_Agnostic | 10/03/06
How come Trend Micro isn't crying?  jpr75_z | 10/03/06
Let us seperate fact from fiction..  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/03/06
Hey McAfee! Don't worry, cuz....  techboy_z | 10/03/06
McAfee Bloated Crap  rjfvillarosa | 10/03/06
McAfee, Norton, etc,etc  jasprey | 10/03/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement