Server compromise delays GNOME 2.6

TalkBack 26 of 33:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

maybe, but who knows

RedHat itself may be hosting for them, even though i don't believe they host much of anything that is not theirs, but hey i could be wrong. After 2 years of being a known vulnerability, you'd be led to think that it was the sys admins fault. There was a patch, it was NOT implemented. If redhat itself were hosting, i'm sure that they have plenty on their plate at the moment other than to make sure something was done for another company. The sys admin would still have to keep up to date on patches for software/aplications he was running no matter who hosted or what dist he/she was using. I still find the sys admin responsible, and i think many would agree if they just think about it in detail.
As always, my opinion, and everyone is entitled to their own.

Posted by: Monkey_MCSE   Posted on: 03/25/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Building the Virtualized Enterprise with VMware Iinfrastructure VMware VMware virtualization software has been adopted by over 120,000 enterprise ... Download Now
• The Dell OEM Industry Solutions Group Beefs Up the ONE Unified Technology Platform Developed by MDI Security Systems Dell When engineers at MDI Security Systems design a global video surveillance ... Download Now
• Security Explorer for SharePoint Version 7.0.2 ScriptLogic Security Explorer for SharePoint is a powerful, graphical solution for ... Download Now