On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 17 of 17:
« Previous
Data Security Not an Issue?
If the standard RFID can be read at thirty feet, I would consider data security a real issue - not when an item is on a base but during transport.

Scenario - data reader buried into roadway or mounted beside road on a pole or mounted on or under a bridge where transports pass. The enemy now know what is being supplied and when.

Scenario 2 - Terrorist leader with small number of troops desperately requiring supplies. A raid at a back of the lines supply unit gets reader and equipment catalog - after all the data is no good if you don't know what it is. He wants to attack convoy to obtain much needed supplies - with the reader data he knows which convoy to attack for the supplies he needs most.

If the convoy is equipped with a countermeasures tell tale that warns of reader transmissions that are needed to trigger responses, then all that is needed are a number of cheaply made decoy transmitters. After digging up a number of decoys, troops get lax as the VC found in Vietnam when they dug holes and didn't plant mines. Eventually troops ignored the decoys and the real one that was planted.

I can see real data security isssues - has xxx base been issued with xxx.
Are the troops equiped for chemical warfare?

If weapons etc are fitted with permanent tags then it is possible to know exactly how many armed personnel are in the back of a truck and what they are equipped with. If tags are only on supplies then the information may be a little less important but could still be vital - does that vehicle carry troops or supplies - what supplies does it carry?

If the Nukes were equiped with the tags then every "friendly" with an antinuke policy would fit readers on their roads etc outside US bases or beside runways as a matter of course.

But may be I'm just cynical...
Posted by: rxtxau   Posted on: 03/25/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Screw RFID; Give our soldiers good armor vests first!  johnsmith222 | 03/22/04
pathetic!  DarbyOhara | 03/23/04
Just a question  sullivanjc | 03/23/04
RFID Security  jcleveland@... | 03/23/04
Wal-Mart is investing to  Hamburger Engineer | 03/23/04
yep -their promise to stop  JWatson77 | 03/24/04
re: Wal-Mart  cammobus@... | 03/25/04
re: Wal-Mart  cammobus@... | 03/25/04
NO more Wal-Mart  e_z | 03/28/04
This is not about RFID but Department of Defense (DoD) personal business.  Vily Clay | 03/23/04
George Bush  sullivanjc | 03/25/04
DOD ??Personal?? Business  daugette@... | 03/25/04
someone can easily get that close to a home on christmas  JWatson77 | 03/23/04
RFID Drawbacks?  rxtxau | 03/25/04
RFID  Dr_Zinj | 03/25/04
Security risk  yachtalegria | 03/25/04
Data Security Not an Issue?  rxtxau | 03/25/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More