On last.fm: Ciara radio - Listen now!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 11 of 17:
Next »
« Previous
George Bush
George Bush was not the only person who thought Iraq had WMD. All our allies (even the Axis of weasels) thought he had them. We still don't know what happened to a lot of them which by Iraq's own account they had.

Iraq was identified as one of three major threats. They were the easiest to pursue because they were in clear violation of numerous UN resolutions that followed the Gulf War. The fact of the matter is he should have been taken out a long time ago (as soon as he violated the cease fire agreement with his waffling and hiding things from inspections).

The inspections that occurred in 2002/2003 prior to the war did uncover some WMD that were illegal under terms of the cease fire, just not the big baddies they were looking for.

While the link to Al Qaeda was sketchy, Iraq was unquestionably funding Palestinian terorists and harboring terorists.

Iraq's leader tried to have a former president assassinated. That alone, in my book, is grounds for war. It doesn't matter if that president is the current president's father.

You can't punish the terrorists that have already blown themselves up. You can go after their assocaites and allies and we have (something the prior administrations did little but lip service to).

George Bush IS the elected president of the United States. Media outlets proved that even if the recounts in Florida took place by the rules Gore wanted, BUSH won, not Gore.

Bush lost the popular vote nationwide but that's not how the president is elected and that's not the first time it's happened.

The more likely election that was stolen was the election in which Kennedy was elected. There was fairly compelling evidence that Illinois was won for Kennedy through fraudulent votes. The difference there was that Nixon chose not to ignite a partisan war that would hurt the country by challenging the results.
Posted by: sullivanjc   Posted on: 03/25/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Screw RFID; Give our soldiers good armor vests first!  johnsmith222 | 03/22/04
pathetic!  DarbyOhara | 03/23/04
Just a question  sullivanjc | 03/23/04
RFID Security  jcleveland@... | 03/23/04
Wal-Mart is investing to  Hamburger Engineer | 03/23/04
yep -their promise to stop  JWatson77 | 03/24/04
re: Wal-Mart  cammobus@... | 03/25/04
re: Wal-Mart  cammobus@... | 03/25/04
NO more Wal-Mart  e_z | 03/28/04
This is not about RFID but Department of Defense (DoD) personal business.  Vily Clay | 03/23/04
George Bush  sullivanjc | 03/25/04
DOD ??Personal?? Business  daugette@... | 03/25/04
someone can easily get that close to a home on christmas  JWatson77 | 03/23/04
RFID Drawbacks?  rxtxau | 03/25/04
RFID  Dr_Zinj | 03/25/04
Security risk  yachtalegria | 03/25/04
Data Security Not an Issue?  rxtxau | 03/25/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More