On TV.com: BIGGEST LOSER Crowns a Winner
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 25 of 102:
Next »
« Previous
You are so correct, but they waste their time!
I, probably like you and others who wisely choose the superior Firefox browser as opposed to the infamous Internet Exploder, can not figure out why the hackers even bother to try against us as we are using Firefox and not the inferior product. They are finally reduced now to trying social engineering tricks on us as Firefox is capable of thwarting the all the old tricks that were so common in the early versions of Internalthreat Eroder. And I have tried the so called new IE 7 and its improved security does not impress me. It is very worrisome to even be trying it as it means you are stuck with using Windowze on at least one of your computers to use it. I have to admit that the tabs on the IE7 do work quite well and for those who think security is the most important thing they might rely on the security features of IE 7 to show how it is better then Firefox in some ways but that is just wasting my time a lot because it is still a Microcrapula product, and that should say something.

Why do the hackers even bother to try on Firefox because Internet Exploder is still much more popular and they would have better efforts against that. I am suspecting one of the reasons why Microcrap increased the security on EI 7 so much is to make other browsers more interesting to attack so that browsers like Firefox will start to show they are not perfect as well but that is something that does not interest us and I should say we are not being helped by Microcrap in this way at all. As usual, all that Gates thinks of is making his products work as smoothly as they can and does not care that more of the smarter users are going to use Firefox and are now a bigger target for the hackers and he does not care a bit that making IE 7 with so many new security features just makes other browsers even more of an idea to look at for attacks. This is typical Microcrap thinking to only look out for their products and not consider the more security they make for their useless product the worse it might become for other products that used to be more secure and less well known.
Posted by: Concordx   Posted on: 07/26/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Just read the McAffee page...  bportlock | 07/26/06
How can I start wc12345678.EXE in Linux?  BigSens0r | 07/27/06
Happy to help!  bportlock | 07/27/06
Exactly, this is just another Windows malfunction.  Mikael_z | 07/27/06
So you think your Linux is safe...  the_seb | 07/27/06
No - I never said that  bportlock | 07/27/06
Fair enough...  the_seb | 07/27/06
Security will always be an issue  bportlock | 07/27/06
Is there people still opening .exe files in their email?  OhMyGosh | 07/26/06
Yes, there are.  Anton Philidor | 07/26/06
Put on a Scale  Sheeva | 07/26/06
Yeah... a SLIDING scale  mlambert890@... | 07/26/06
MS is less secure than *nix (including OS X)  babar77 | 07/26/06
Microsoft users...  Anton Philidor | 07/26/06
What software does.  Anton Philidor | 07/26/06
what I do  craftycorner@... | 07/27/06
Avast...  belkorin | 07/28/06
Is it an .exe?  Michael Kelly | 07/26/06
Probably not an .exe  JDThompson | 07/26/06
What?  DemonX | 07/26/06
More or less what I meant  bportlock | 07/26/06
There are people who still think it is not important to have anti-virus  bammike | 07/26/06
"Is" there people that still don't know english grammer?  phoneguy8099@... | 07/27/06
FUD through social engineering -- again!  999ad@... | 07/26/06
You are so correct, but they waste their time!  Concordx | 07/26/06
Any application that supports plugins can be parasitised  Resuna | 07/26/06
Got a license for that thing, son?  nottheusual1 | 07/26/06
Hey I had that one!  IceTheNet@... | 07/26/06
inspiration  shryko | 07/29/06
Meanwhile back in Microsoft land....  jinko | 07/26/06
You really wonder  NeutralityNow | 07/26/06
to be honest  galileon | 07/26/06
Yes! Ha! We know what ones!!  Concordx | 07/26/06
ZDnet Check your links  IceTheNet@... | 07/26/06
We are aware of these problems  DougOfCBS ZDNet Moderator | 08/09/06
Still not as dangerous as IE:6 or IE:7 Now !!!  IceTheNet@... | 07/26/06
Firefox Update 1.5.0.5  IceTheNet@... | 07/27/06
YAWN  Shelendrea | 07/26/06
indeed  shryko | 07/29/06
Here, IE is safer than FireFox  lfugate@... | 07/26/06
mmm i think you need to read  barsteward | 07/26/06
single action vs. full auto...  aussiedawg | 07/26/06
IE is NEVER safer than Firefox  IceTheNet@... | 07/26/06
Please read for content.  Resuna | 07/26/06
I would be afraid  SC-man | 07/26/06
You have just excused MS for a lot of things  the_seb | 07/27/06
IE is safer than Firefox  jasprey | 07/26/06
Yeah, right...  baka_toroi | 07/26/06
agree as well..although Id say neither is more secure than the other  jimk_z | 07/27/06
How about now is that too late for you or would you rather  IceTheNet@... | 07/27/06
Firefox is WAY more Secure than IE:  IceTheNet@... | 07/27/06
It just goes to show that  KrazyGuy | 07/26/06
Spot on...  mlambert890@... | 07/26/06
why should you  IceTheNet@... | 07/26/06
Fanaticism aside  SC-man | 07/26/06
Precisely...  bargeemike | 07/27/06
Targeted, Yes  Hrothgar - PCLinuxOS User | 07/26/06
Who uses unprotected systems?  dsilvia | 07/26/06
Re: Who uses unprotected systems  venus111 | 07/26/06
Small correction  SC-man | 07/26/06
The amount would stagger the concious mind  IceTheNet@... | 07/26/06
IceTheNet - You're Right On The Money  nycgriff@... | 08/02/06
U wouldn't believe how many  a40961_z | 07/26/06
RE: Who uses unprotected systems  tagginannie | 07/26/06
DoubleClickThis.exe  Reverend MacFellow | 07/26/06
Why?  IceTheNet@... | 07/26/06
I'm clicking! I'm clicking  unoriginal_sin | 07/26/06
Attacks on Firefox..  td1putt@... | 07/26/06
simple  jimk_z | 07/27/06
Seconded  the_seb | 07/27/06
In THIS PARTICULAR CASE,  Joel R | 07/27/06
Users aren't to blame  dsilvia | 07/26/06
FUD is FUD ... once again  StupidScript | 07/26/06
Oops ... the extension name  StupidScript | 07/26/06
Re: Users aren't to blame  venus111 | 07/26/06
Possibly so  SC-man | 07/26/06
RE: Attacks on Firefox...  dsilvia | 07/26/06
Firefox still safer  Boot_Agnostic | 07/26/06
Curious...  j.dupont | 07/26/06
Bravo , bravo ,,,  Intellihence | 07/26/06
~~ UPDATE IS AVAILABLE ~~  Loverock Davidson | 07/26/06
You've got to be kidding .  Intellihence | 07/26/06
I kid you not  Loverock Davidson | 07/27/06
McAffee response to threat disappointing  Zebralady | 07/26/06
IE or FIREFOX neither are safer  golowenow | 07/26/06
Firefox 1.5.0.5 coincidence  Furiousrog | 07/26/06
Hey...  bargeemike | 07/27/06
My Mac is running fine....  mitch381 | 07/26/06
Troll  RDrr | 07/26/06
what was untrue?  Reverend MacFellow | 07/27/06
for how long?  the_seb | 07/27/06
probablly true, but ...  Reverend MacFellow | 07/27/06
Why would anyone use a pc?  Reverend MacFellow | 07/27/06
27 MINUTES BEFORE THE IE SECURITY WARNING  DontFeedTrolls | 07/26/06
So hows regular Mozilla suite holding up  Boot_Agnostic | 07/27/06
Use Opera. Feel Safe.....  Scrat | 07/27/06
Unix, Linux, Firefox and Apple are Perfect !  jpr75_z | 07/27/06
Take a chill pill!  D@... | 07/27/06
Perfect huh? Want to buy a bridge or some swamp land?  liqour43@... | 07/27/06
Easter bunny?  Unemployed IT Guy | 07/27/06
There is nothing perfect in the wold except perhaps this  IceTheNet@... | 07/27/06
You are so right  Boot_Agnostic | 07/27/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement