On TechRepublic: Linux desktops have tanked: Get over it
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 25 of 37:
Next »
« Previous
I do not understand your mind at all.
How can you like Windowz OS so much it makes no sense?? Linux is the better product and it can be obtained for no cost with minimal efforts and if you are very good at installing you can sometimes install it completely on your own, even with only very few problems that hardly cause any issues.

There is no need for such old fashioned things as antivirus and you can use Firefox instead of Infernalnet Eroder. For Symantec to always work so close with Microcrap under any circumstances as they are only looking to improve security of Windowz and if they keep doing this it is not going to be of help when hackers look to other operating systems to attack because Windowz is getting secure. This is just more typical CRUD made by Gates to make Windowz better and not thinking of how it might eventually make more security issues for others if he makes Windowz better.

I am betting you like Intel too, its like part of the way you think or something
Posted by: Concordx   Posted on: 07/26/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

The February preview??  toadlife | 07/24/06
That doesn't sell product.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/25/06
Like it matters...  Wolfie2K3 | 07/25/06
Symantec continues  not of this world | 07/25/06
No holes in Beta2? The comedy continues.\  Richard Flude | 07/25/06
Oh, it most certainly does!!!  NonZealot | 07/25/06
Er.. Vaporware...?  Wolfie2K3 | 07/25/06
Vapourware? Cool saying man.  Cayble | 07/25/06
Vista dealine problem solved  myshortname | 07/25/06
Bug hunt in Symantec products  Boot_Agnostic | 07/25/06
Symantec continues Vista bug hunt  Loverock Davidson | 07/25/06
8.2  nucrash | 07/25/06
Why?  Loverock Davidson | 07/25/06
Loverock Davidson is right!  lovvvvie | 07/25/06
ROTFLMAO!!!  Intellihence | 07/25/06
RIP Symantec...  Wolfie2K3 | 07/25/06
Too funny  bitfuzzy | 07/25/06
Ha Ha. Not really. We have Mike Cox already copy cat.  Cayble | 07/25/06
Cayble is right!  lovvvvie | 07/26/06
Sorry...  Cayble | 07/26/06
Wow...  zkiwi | 07/25/06
Why would I do that?  Loverock Davidson | 07/25/06
Mike Cox 2.0!  Reverend MacFellow | 07/25/06
Na, their just jumping on the...  Jay E Court | 07/26/06
I do not understand your mind at all.  Concordx | 07/26/06
Poor, Sad Symantec  jpr75_z | 07/25/06
You you hear that music Symantec?  zmud | 07/25/06
Yeah, because beta bugs NEVER make it to public release... (nt)  Zeppo9191 | 07/25/06
symantec is gonna change that!  Reverend MacFellow | 07/25/06
I Wish I was that Poor  ProfKing | 07/26/06
Yes and no.  Cayble | 07/26/06
Taken to its logical conclusion  NonZealot | 07/25/06
Symantec, bitter much?  Dreamer Zero | 07/25/06
ActiveX in MSIE is inherently unfixable.  Resuna | 07/25/06
Desperately seeking revenue  TonyMcS | 07/25/06
Do you want a more secure OS?  tony@... | 07/26/06
The words secure and Microsoft should never  warezdog | 07/26/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline