On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 9 of 22:
Next »
« Previous
LD's comparison inept.
Microsoft has a security conference, people release the right for Microsoft to use whatever they say. Sounds fair enough, its no different than a reporter quoting someone at press conference.

You haven't been to many press conferences, have you Loverock. At a press conference the attendees are given information by the caller of the conference with the express permission, and expectation, that the reporters will use the information and talk. With Microsoft's security conference, the restrictions are opposite to the press conference.

Read the article again! An NDA prevents attendees from talking about information Microsoft gives, thereby they are unable to do peer review, or even talk about the security failings of Microsoft products. The information given can never "get out". Meanwhile, Microsoft takes express license to any and all information given by attendees, and, here's the rub, Microsoft is not bound by to mutual non-disclosure. Thereby Microsoft may take information and use it both to slam competitors products and compete in an area they've just entered. This is no better, if I might be permitted to hyper-extend, than contractual industrial espionage.

the information flow is meant to flow towards Microsoft and nowherelse. I can understand why parnters might be nervous. The answer, of course, is if they're nervous; they should simply not attend. As one interviewee pointed out: Microsoft has not given them any information not already available online. The competitors no longer need Microsoft and should stop suckling at the beast's teat.
Posted by: John Le'Brecage   Posted on: 07/24/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

IP theft is standard Microsoft procedure  whisperycat | 07/24/06
Plottin world domination and Hello Kitty products  Boot_Agnostic | 07/24/06
This is a ridiculous story  zzz1234567890 | 07/24/06
First thing you've ever said that merits a response...  yogeee | 07/24/06
Chills at Microsoft's security huddle  Loverock Davidson | 07/24/06
ROFLMAO Microsoft Taking Security Seriously  itanalyst | 07/24/06
roflmfao  not of this world | 07/24/06
Well...  zkiwi | 07/24/06
LD's comparison inept.  John Le'Brecage | 07/24/06
Why did they attend?  Anton Philidor | 07/24/06
Microsoft has no idea  talisman | 07/24/06
Presumably because...  zkiwi | 07/24/06
What - nothing about those great NEW symlinks?  Roger Ramjet | 07/25/06
Just shooting itself in the foot  el1jones | 07/24/06
I have been unhappy with the current crop of A/V products for years  balsover | 07/24/06
Microsoft and Everyone else.  rupaa62 | 07/24/06
Talk about a growth industry  jamesski@... | 07/24/06
microsoft security,?????  alandee4 | 07/24/06
MS gives me chills with every move lately.  Narg | 07/24/06
What a nice company  Richard Flude | 07/24/06
The security companies have nothing.....  Jay E Court | 07/24/06
MS has a short memory......  devlin_X | 07/30/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More