On CBS MoneyWatch: 6 things NOT to do on Twitter, Facebook
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 18 of 35:
Next »
« Previous
Re: Security Programs Becomming Major Infection Vector
-Beginning of the quote...

The "Witty" worm writes random data onto the hard drives of
computers equipped with the Black Ice and Real Secure Internet
firewall products, causing the drives to fail and making it
impossible to restart the PCs. Unlike many recent worms that
arrive as e-mail attachments, it spreads automatically to
vulnerable computers without any action on the part of the
user."

"At least 50,000 computers have been infected so far, according
to Reston, Va.-based computer security firm iDefense and the
Bethesda, Md.-based SANS Institute."

"Most infected computers will have to be rebuilt from scratch
unless their owners instead decide to buy new ones, said Ken
Dunham, a computer security expert at iDefense."

"The thing looks like it will corrupt or crash most drives enough
so that reinstallation is going to be required," he said. "This is a
very destructive worm."

...End of the quote.-

If that is the case, if all the security venders can avoid using ActiveX/COM, then .net Framework is the way to go, although I am aware of Windows 95 but Windows 95 are very outdated.

If I were you, I would use a couple of programs to protect my computer:

FirstDefense (from Raxcon, if I remember the spelling correctly)
PerfectDisk (also from Raxcon)
McAfee Security Suite (with Virus Scan, Firewall Plus, etc.)
Webroot Spy Sweeper

Of course, I do know that those applications that I've listed doesn't use .net Framework; although I don't have any problems with those products.

(Whew, looks like I'm lucky that I don't use Norton products, BlackIce, and RealSecure...which I'm safe from those exploits but I don't want to let this happen in the future if an attacker tries to execute a flaw in FirstDefense, PerfectDisk, and McAfee Internet Security Suite, which I am better off having to stay active all the time and catch up with ZDNet News to see if there's any news comming up but I don't want to sign up for ZDNet Breaking News. And I will never ever give up hope!)
Posted by: GraysonPeddie   Posted on: 03/22/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

It figures  Squawkbox | 03/19/04
And want to come to a Linux box near you  FilledOut | 03/19/04
ActiveX was an exploit waiting to happen  Chad_z | 03/19/04
ActiveX exploits are why I'm using Firefox  jfrankcarr | 03/20/04
Don't assume you're safe ...  George Jay | 03/20/04
By you can assume your MUCH safer  David Mohring | 03/20/04
Well, now you're getting somewhere  jfrankcarr | 03/21/04
And people laughed...........  nite_w0lf | 03/19/04
Blame Norton  boxmonkey | 03/20/04
You have to use ActiveX in this case  jfrankcarr | 03/20/04
Active X for security?  michael-t | 03/20/04
Dogs and fleas  bjbrock | 03/20/04
Dogs and fleas  seosamh_z | 03/21/04
Re: Dogs & fleas  MammyNun | 03/23/04
But...  DragonBRockin | 03/20/04
Hey, where's No_Ax?  Chad_z | 03/20/04
Security Programs Becoming Major Infection Vector  Aphelion | 03/21/04
Re: Security Programs Becomming Major Infection Vector  GraysonPeddie | 03/22/04
virus authors  angrymuthu | 03/21/04
The .net Framework might be better...  GraysonPeddie | 03/21/04
The .net Framework might be better...  seosamh_z | 03/21/04
It's always the "next" version with MSFT  Chad_z | 03/21/04
It's always the "next" version with MSFT  seosamh_z | 03/22/04
.net is 10 years LATE  michael-t | 03/21/04
.net is 10 years LATE  seosamh_z | 03/22/04
MS and 'modern' technologies ....  michael-t | 03/22/04
Anybody notice...  Yen_z | 03/21/04
Substitute Java and ...  ShadeTree | 03/22/04
ActiveX is far more than scripting  jfrankcarr | 03/22/04
Mixing metaphors.  ShadeTree | 03/22/04
Sorry, but you are quite confused  jfrankcarr | 03/22/04
you mean jsp, lets be clear - not Sun Java  JWatson77 | 03/24/04
then again MS Java did have a few vulnerabilities  JWatson77 | 03/24/04
What Idiot Uses ActiveX for Security? Only Symantec...  brenthawkinsmd | 03/22/04
activex? lol  JWatson77 | 03/24/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline