On UrbanBaby: What is a Helicopter Mom?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 8 of 10:
Next »
« Previous
ONLY 65 holes?
For a high profiled company based around security, 65 holes seems rather extreme. Large comapnies lately have done a poor job at keeping their customer databases to themselves (CitiBank etc.) and if Oracle didn't fix this so soon, it could have caused even more major problems.

If large companies can rid themselves of these major vulnerabilities, customers can stop worrying about their information within online coorporations.
http://www.essentialsecurity.com/Documents/article17.htm
Posted by: Nathank@...   Posted on: 07/19/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

CPU? What a bad choice for an acronym.  PB_z | 07/18/06
Sounds like a mini patch compared to Microsofts MEGA(lomanic) patches. EOS.  nomorems | 07/18/06
Hey ZDNET, where is the word "mega"?  mdemuth | 07/18/06
oooh...must be because they are supported by Apple, Sun, Netscape, AOL, IBM  nomorems | 07/18/06
It is not MS so let's ignore it  theraven_z | 07/19/06
LOL-- remember the "unbreakable" campaign? (nt)  kckn4fun | 07/19/06
65 defects at a time ?? I didn't know Oracle hired MS "engineers" ... wink  michael_t | 07/19/06
ONLY 65 holes?  Nathank@... | 07/19/06
65!!! Who did they hire Michael, It analyst, Yeah Right  Boot_Agnostic | 07/19/06
Oracle invites hackers, Trojans and the like  milal@... | 07/19/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More