On TechRepublic: 12 tech terms that make you sound old
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 40 of 98:
Next »
« Previous
You are a little too easy... wink follow your "wisdom" and don't get upset
before talking.

My little fellow, your fuzzy perception of reality may had some CREDIT IF there were NO OTHER systems that are MORE SECURE, MORE STABLE and MORE COMPLEX than this Barbie "OS" which you seem to admire so much. Why really? Defies logic... wink

Let me help you out a little, HOPING that you can wake up one morning and smell the donuts:

I know of TRUE OSs which can run on ccNUMA SMPs from a few 10s of processors to a few 1000s of them. These OSs are efficient and very stable. They have to contend with a MUCH HARSER and difficult to handle environment, yet they do so efficiently and w/o a hitch (unlike the MS Barbie "OS")

The same systems allow several 10,000s of concurrent processes to run, while they handle 10,000s of I/O to a wide number of I/O devices (fibre-channel arrays, infiniband and GigE or 10GigE networks, etc.)

The same systems handle efficiently TeraBytes of DRAM whithout chocking and allow 100s to 1000s of users solve very complex problems.

As for the devices they need to deal efficiently with 100s of devices, belonging to a wide variety of I/O device types.

Most importantly, the SAME systems are EXTREMELY STABLE and SECURE.

If I was not familiar with these types of REAL systems I could give you some benefit of the doubt.

It is unfortunate that you just don't give some benefit of the doubt to other people which maybe much more educated and skilled than you (let alone with more common sense wink )

So, as a famous Freek Philosopher said:

Suck it up and go to get some University Classes to get on with your life happy

got it? (I doubt)
Posted by: michael_t   Posted on: 06/16/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Well then, those Google Spreadsheets are right on time  Boot_Agnostic | 06/16/06
Google is behind this!!  NonZealot | 06/16/06
It was one of them  Boot_Agnostic | 06/16/06
Your such an idiot!  Linux User 147560 | 06/16/06
I was expecting something better than this Non-Zealot.  I'm Ye, the MS SHILL . | 06/17/06
Who needs Google spyware?  georgep_z | 06/16/06
Your web browser would have to have a flaw for Google spyware  quantumstate | 06/16/06
Google Spreadsheets are just a toy so far but...  jason.mailley | 06/16/06
just the tip of the iceberg  not of this world | 06/16/06
Why is it, so incredibly hard for MS to completely patch  michael_t | 06/16/06
Why is it the only people that are complaining ...  ShadeTree | 06/16/06
Linux Luddites?  techboy_z | 06/16/06
Now now  NonZealot | 06/16/06
Let me take some of this back  NonZealot | 06/16/06
Since..  cashaww | 06/17/06
Ask yourself why?  NonZealot | 06/19/06
Yes Linux Luddites.  ShadeTree | 06/19/06
Linux Luddites  uM0p ap!sdn | 06/19/06
ok  Jack-Booted EULA | 06/16/06
You use name calling because you are incapable to reply as a  michael_t | 06/16/06
WOW!!!!  Code Poet | 06/16/06
Welcome to the "WeLoveourMS" Club  michael_t | 06/16/06
What are you talking about?  Code Poet | 06/16/06
Please let me explain...  ShadeTree | 06/19/06
apology accepted but do not do it again !  michael_t | 06/19/06
For the record...  slingzenarrowzuvowtrayjissforchin | 06/16/06
It could be...  cashaww | 06/17/06
illegitimate & illiterate  Network Support | 06/17/06
well it seems to me you understand so little  Andric_D | 06/16/06
I am sorry that you shoot yourself in the foot, but before you blow  michael_t | 06/16/06
Here you go, read and weep  Cayble | 06/16/06
So even though what is state is "not very smart" why CANN'T you REPLY?  michael_t | 06/16/06
just copy the contents of this site in your reply  michael_t | 06/16/06
Cayble  Network Support | 06/17/06
Sorry, your too quick for me. I give.  Cayble | 06/17/06
Sure  tslocum7 | 06/19/06
Your questions are childish and yet very old.  Cayble | 06/16/06
Yet you failed to provide any definite and conlussive answer... why?  michael_t | 06/16/06
No Greek philosopher said that nonsense  Cayble | 06/16/06
You are a little too easy... wink follow your "wisdom" and don't get upset  michael_t | 06/16/06
What? Ha! Now your getting comical!  Cayble | 06/16/06
Iroonically,  michael_t | 06/16/06
You mised an important detail...  byeats | 06/19/06
that you are trying to spin the obvious away just to make MS look  michael_t | 06/19/06
To michael_t, the answer to your question  Cayble | 06/19/06
Sorry..  cashaww | 06/17/06
Sorry, but I said all that, in one way or another  Cayble | 06/17/06
????  tslocum7 | 06/19/06
Scince XP SP2 and Win Defender  Cayble | 06/30/06
You ask why?  GreyGeek | 06/17/06
Real Security is a HW and SW issue  bazimmerman | 06/18/06
Just shows...  Cardinal_Bill | 06/16/06
Diversion tactics!!!  techboy_z | 06/16/06
Concentrate on XP not Vista  RicD_ | 06/16/06
M$ gave up on XP years ago.  Mr. Roboto | 06/17/06
Gave up on XP? What about SP2?  PB_z | 06/22/06
Like I said, you are about 100x safer with OpenOffice. You will also save a  DonnieBoy | 06/16/06
your even safer with a calculator  corticus | 06/16/06
Actually, safer with a slide rule. But, you get full functionality with OO,  DonnieBoy | 06/17/06
Full functionality?  KTLA | 06/18/06
If by saving a fortune  mdemuth | 06/16/06
Receiving paycheck from Microsoft  jason.mailley | 06/16/06
Conversion is a one time expense. Microsoft software assurance is forever.  DonnieBoy | 06/17/06
Another of ZD Net's "Zero Day Trolls"  Code Poet | 06/16/06
"open in safe mode"  davidr69 | 06/16/06
Every time MS BOTCHED development resurfaces, the USUAL  michael_t | 06/16/06
What's up with that?  Code Poet | 06/16/06
You can not fool anybody ... poet; You SIDESTEPPED  michael_t | 06/16/06
Dude...  Code Poet | 06/16/06
Hahaha ... that's a good one ....  michael_t | 06/16/06
Whats up is  Network Support | 06/17/06
are you kidding me? Do you term "alot" by three or four?  warezdog | 06/19/06
if only was so simple  Andric_D | 06/16/06
Apparently it is simpler for others than you.  michael_t | 06/16/06
Yes...  cashaww | 06/17/06
Well, Michael_T,  MageOfChaos | 06/18/06
For clarity,  MageOfChaos | 06/18/06
you and "clarity"? Isn't this wishful thinking ?  michael_t | 06/19/06
Your message applies perfectly to you happy Is this a conicidence  michael_t | 06/19/06
Well, Mikey,  MageOfChaos | 06/19/06
I am sorry, I guess the message was not clear enough (with all the chaos  michael_t | 06/20/06
Not relevant...  Mike Cox | 06/16/06
Clicks? Is that all you do?  gardoglee | 06/16/06
9.5  Network Support | 06/17/06
Ya, Mikey is a real hoot  Cayble | 06/17/06
Relevant  TheHonestTruth | 06/16/06
Even MORE incredible, of course...  deej_z | 06/16/06
RE: Even MORE incredible, of course...  richdave | 06/16/06
If I had Mike's luck out on the lake...  John Zern | 06/16/06
Good advice Mike ,  I'm Ye, the MS SHILL . | 06/17/06
Well, Root,  MageOfChaos | 06/18/06
New Excel zero-day flaw used in attacks  phburks | 06/16/06
Not quite ALL versions of Excel  AldoWatts | 06/16/06
Excel X for Mac?  gfeier | 06/17/06
Simplicity  jasexjase | 06/17/06
They made your bed, You have to sleep in it  jonathan swift | 06/19/06
If they made anything else they'd be outta business  warezdog | 06/19/06
I like the fact tha MS is trying to compete with Google's search  michael_t | 06/19/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here