On CBS.com: Exclusive video from MEDIUM
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 4 of 62:
Next »
« Previous
Funny
"No doubt open source is more secure, but open source !=
linux!!!"

True but linux (the kernel) is open source, and most code in
major linux distributions is also open source.

So if open source is more secure than windows, what part of
Linux would not benefit?

"Not to mention that Windows has an incredible amount of
market share so that makes them more vulnerable to exploits
since they are the bigger target and more people are using it."

So your point is anything with a smaller market share is more
secure than windows.

"How is the system administrator going to know when an update
is available? Especially"

Because we subscribe to security mailing lists.

"They will have to check each application's version with the
developer's version. A very tedious task. "

Or get a commercially support distribution like SLES or RHEL and
pay these companies to do this "tedious task" for you.

"Then bring the server down to install the patches. At least with
Windows you know what day to expect patches and can plan
accordingly. Thats one advantage Windows has."

You bring servers down to install patches, how quaint.

"I altered my linux box by installing FreeBSD instead. It's never
worked better."

FreeBSD, really the BSD family, are very good OSes with an
excellent security record. The work they've done with openssl in
particular is of tremendous benefit to the entire open source
community.

FreeBSD being a good OS doesn't exclude Linux from also being
one.
Posted by: Richard Flude   Posted on: 06/13/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Trend Micro: Open source is more secure  Loverock Davidson | 06/13/06
Loverock Davidson tried to make a funny...............  Can you hear me | 06/13/06
It was funny  Loverock Davidson | 06/13/06
Funny  Richard Flude | 06/13/06
RE: Funny  richdave | 06/13/06
Yeah  Loverock Davidson | 06/13/06
Funny when I explain why  Loverock Davidson | 06/13/06
BSD put a fork in it - never mind, already done.  Roger Ramjet | 06/14/06
Now now  Loverock Davidson | 06/14/06
I know you are, but what am I?  Roger Ramjet | 06/14/06
Yep  Loverock Davidson | 06/14/06
Find out what you're talking about  bportlock | 06/14/06
You need to know what your talking about  Loverock Davidson | 06/14/06
PLEASE!!! Stop feeding this troll!  linux for me | 06/14/06
Stop feeding yourself?  Loverock Davidson | 06/14/06
I agree mostly  Roger Ramjet | 06/14/06
Does it bother you  Loverock Davidson | 06/14/06
Roger...  Tony Agudo | 06/14/06
Making fun of "stupid" is entertaining  Roger Ramjet | 06/14/06
Also could be said  Loverock Davidson | 06/14/06
dude - lovey is a girl  not of this world | 06/14/06
I just happened to do updates on both an XP box and Linux box this morning  George Mitchell | 06/14/06
You forgot one thing  NonZealot | 06/14/06
You have the option to choose  Loverock Davidson | 06/14/06
Not on updates marked critical when using 'Express Update'  George Mitchell | 06/14/06
Great  Boot_Agnostic | 06/13/06
The problem is still the number of new lines of code in Vista. Yes, they  DonnieBoy | 06/13/06
please talk sense  zzz1234567890 | 06/13/06
You mean...  Henrik Moller | 06/13/06
Shoot, you beat me to it!  Tony Agudo | 06/13/06
Since....  LinuxHippie | 06/14/06
You're close...  Tony Agudo | 06/14/06
I noticed decon backed out  Linux User 147560 | 06/14/06
I would hardly call that OS code  code_Warrior | 06/14/06
I do know to read and write code. Do *nix fanboys know (including DonnieBoy  zzz1234567890 | 06/14/06
You had to refer a book?  Tony Agudo | 06/14/06
hey.... finally someone answers  zzz1234567890 | 06/14/06
Actually...  LinuxHippie | 06/14/06
Have you STILL not done your homework??  Zogg | 06/14/06
none from the open source community could answer this  zzz1234567890 | 06/14/06
Actually...  LinuxHippie | 06/14/06
Re: Actually...  Tony Agudo | 06/14/06
Extra correction  Tony Agudo | 06/14/06
yes...but  LinuxHippie | 06/14/06
There's a problem with your version...  Tony Agudo | 06/14/06
I think they were busy laughing at the "sophistication" of the Q... wink n  michael_t | 06/15/06
too bad Linux aint as good  zzz1234567890 | 06/14/06
TrendMicro feeling the heat  zzz1234567890 | 06/13/06
let see here  zzz1234567890 | 06/13/06
The Barbie Principle of Security  michael_t | 06/13/06
you missed the point  zzz1234567890 | 06/13/06
I'm curious  zkiwi | 06/13/06
Security of Trend products.  dtbullock | 06/14/06
All Hail King Tux !  st!lborn | 06/14/06
Forking as a security enhancement  Roger Ramjet | 06/14/06
Anyone who uses OSS knows it's true  Chad_z | 06/14/06
Hey I'm an MCSE  voska | 06/14/06
asinine comment  Flybyte | 06/14/06
And Trend is known for being a solid, reliable company.  HypnoToad | 06/14/06
dinosaurs were a strong, powerful creatures  zzz1234567890 | 06/14/06
"Open source is more secure" is NOT NEWS really.  michael_t | 06/14/06
Pls slow down there fella's! What's the hurry happy .... !  michael_t | 06/15/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here