On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 30 of 36:
Next »
« Previous
re: Strike Back at Spammers
>>I think it would be wonderful to have an e-mail function that would "Return to Sender" unaccepted and unopened.<<

Hmm.. I think you might be on to something...

But a simple "return to sender, refused" item is not going to work. Just as clicking on a "unsubscribe" link in a spammed e-mail is a bad thing (it validates your e-mail address as being a valid destination), returning it with a "refused" stamp will likely do the same thing.

BUT... On the other hand, if there were a piece of software that could create an e-mail that "bounces" the e-mail back to the spammer as it would if it were sent to a bad e-mail address, then we might have something...

Unfortunately, just as easily as it would be to forge an e-mail bounce and send it to the source, it would be even easier to spoof an e-mail address from someone and put it in the FROM and REPLY TO fields in the e-mail.

Ah well.. It was a thought.
Posted by: Wolfie2K3   Posted on: 03/11/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

sounds good  Valis Keogh | 03/10/04
and...  ryusen | 03/10/04
re: sounds good  Octol | 03/11/04
very bad idea  Willibee | 03/11/04
Anyone else think this is a really bad idea?  Chad_z | 03/10/04
agreed what happens when you trick it  acaluya | 03/10/04
just us and a few security experts (nt)  ryusen | 03/10/04
As long as  michael-t | 03/10/04
Chicken or egg  rapson | 03/10/04
Chicken or egg  SC-man | 03/10/04
Disturbing Reality  michael-t | 03/10/04
Disturbing Reality  SC-man | 03/11/04
Reality is defined  michael-t | 03/10/04
Not justify - explain  rapson | 03/10/04
practial effectiveness?  ryusen | 03/10/04
I do not like  michael-t | 03/10/04
Horrible idea  OhMyGosh | 03/10/04
Dangerous games because each force creates a contra-force.  Vily Clay | 03/10/04
Thirty years later and we are back at MAD  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/10/04
bad anology  Rembrandt Pussyhorse | 03/10/04
I was being facetious.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/10/04
Welcome to my world  rapson | 03/10/04
MAD doesn't work anymore...  ryusen | 03/10/04
I have a better idea  worknman | 03/10/04
re: I have a better idea  Wolfie2K3 | 03/11/04
done that  Suicida| | 03/13/04
This should be incorperated into Longhorn!!  nite_w0lf | 03/10/04
About time  mkkokc | 03/11/04
Strike Back at Spammers  margsi2 | 03/11/04
re: Strike Back at Spammers  Wolfie2K3 | 03/11/04
Could the strike-back close the open ports?  Gustavo_z | 03/11/04
Not strong enough .. wrong approach  johns_z | 03/11/04
Great more cybercowboys yeehaw  Willibee | 03/11/04
Software Attcking Wrong Servers  bobpcomputer | 03/11/04
Similar idea has already been done...  ejhonda | 03/11/04
Snort already does this  Suicida| | 03/13/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here