On CHOW: How to avoid dirty looks at cafes
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 18 of 40:
Next »
« Previous
How could ZDNet *possibly* get the story so wrong???
The story starts off:

U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and FBI Director Robert Mueller on Friday urged telecommunications officials to record their customers' Internet activities, CNET News.com has learned.

Given that lead paragraph, I can understand people's concerns about "spying". What I can't understand, however, is how ZDNet, a technology site, could lead off with such a deceptive paragraph. Gonzales and Mueller are talking about retaining data the ISPs already collect, not expanding that data. And retaining that data in and of itself says nothing about how the government gets at it.

The privacy arguments advanced in the article also seem weak:

Privacy advocates have been alarmed by the idea of legally mandated data retention, saying that, while child exploitation may be the justification today, those records would be available in all kinds of criminal and civil suits--including terrorism, tax evasion, drug, and even divorce cases.

Maybe you could make a case that a divorce isn't a serious enough thing to justify looking into someone's Internet use, but why should terrorists, tax evaders, and drug dealers get a free ride just because they do their business on the Internet? What possible sense does that make?

I can see the ISPs objecting to retaining the data, but only on resource grounds. Keeping massive amounts of data for a long time could get expensive -- particularly when politicians throw the word "permanent" out there. On that ground, I can see them being reluctant. But to protect terrorists, tax evadors, or drug dealers? C'mon, get serious.
Posted by: bhartman36   Posted on: 05/27/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Pure Insanity...  BitTwiddler | 05/26/06
Easier, more effective way to catch them...  jinko | 05/28/06
What else should we expect from socialists? [nt]  Omch'Ar | 05/26/06
LOL, I love your style. It's so lacking in substance!  HypnoToad72 | 05/27/06
Whatever you say, ultracrepidarian  Omch'Ar | 05/29/06
A germ of truth doesn't make it true  osreinstall | 05/30/06
well.....  wrench_ninja | 05/30/06
You mean "fascists", right?  TimeBomb | 05/27/06
That's what I said  Omch'Ar | 05/29/06
Thanks a lot Jackball!!!  nucrash | 05/26/06
ISPs should tell them to bring a court order. If I were an ISP, I would  DonnieBoy | 05/26/06
If he knows everything I've seen,read,know...  welcome to hell | 05/26/06
AT&T  petemitchell | 05/27/06
If it feels good, do it.  HypnoToad72 | 05/27/06
In the tradeoff  Boot_Agnostic | 05/27/06
6 billion people to keep an eye on; most of which are "over there"  HypnoToad72 | 05/27/06
I think you know who "does the deeming"  TimeBomb | 05/27/06
How could ZDNet *possibly* get the story so wrong???  bhartman36 | 05/27/06
As if!  mloftis@... | 05/27/06
Terrorists, Fraudsters, and Tax Cheats, Oh My!!!  bhartman36 | 05/27/06
blackmail is the currency of power  welcome to hell | 05/28/06
Objections  bhartman36 | 05/28/06
It ain't about porn-  The Tautologist | 05/29/06
Power  bhartman36 | 05/30/06
Re: Terrorists, Fraudsters, and Tax Cheats, Oh My!!!  none none | 05/29/06
Logs  bhartman36 | 05/29/06
This has *NOTHING* to do with Child Pornography!  mloftis@... | 05/27/06
What about the numbers too?  mloftis@... | 05/27/06
Freedom of privacy is a myth  Dave P. | 05/28/06
Don't count on it.... child porn is just their excuse..  shawkins | 05/28/06
wedge issues  welcome to hell | 05/28/06
A little more info on police cars  voska | 05/29/06
Shocked Shocked to find out there's....  zstrongz | 05/28/06
once again down the treacherous road  txdufus@... | 05/28/06
The Bushies are clueless about tech  AldoWatts | 05/28/06
web server logs  welcome to hell | 05/28/06
webserver not ISP  welcome to hell | 05/28/06
of course  zonmoy | 05/28/06
Heck, maybe it'll lead to new obscuring technologies  Boot_Agnostic | 05/30/06
Electronic Communication Transactional Records Act  Nancy Lewis | 06/28/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc