On BNET: Online porn struggles for profits
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 20 of 20:
« Previous
Shouldn't they leave it on for lazy non enterprise users
and let enterprise users image their systems to their own managed enterprise standards, which may not even include the Vista firewall?

Thank goodness you won't be using it, you'll have nothing to post or complain about, . . it's not your backyard.
Posted by: Boot_Agnostic   Posted on: 04/28/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

They don't want MS protection? Or they've got something reliable instead?  HypnoToad72 | 04/27/06
Didn't you know...  ju1ce | 04/27/06
Only if your Firewall Admin is a lazy bum  nucrash | 04/27/06
Hey nu...  ju1ce | 04/27/06
Re: Only if your Firewall Admin is a lazy bum  none none | 04/27/06
Simplicity over Security ... again ...  ac2_z | 04/27/06
I agree..  ju1ce | 04/27/06
So turn it on yourself  georgeou | 04/27/06
Not so simple and not all about security  ibabadur1 | 04/27/06
thats like saying  not of this world | 04/27/06
It also makes it easier  bjbrock | 04/27/06
phone home?  xuniL_z | 04/27/06
Re: phone home?  none none | 04/27/06
Here you go  xuniL_z | 04/29/06
copy edit this story!  ChazzMatt | 04/27/06
What?  ThomasAnderson | 04/27/06
No, that's what he meant and it works both ways  georgeou | 04/27/06
Very sensible. Security can never get int he way of usability  mrjonno | 04/28/06
I agree...  jinko | 04/28/06
Shouldn't they leave it on for lazy non enterprise users  Boot_Agnostic | 04/28/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement