On GameSpot: Handheld Xbox coming...eventually.
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 34 of 64:
Next »
« Previous
Incorrect
You are confusing privilege separation with UAC. XP already provides for privilege separation. In UAC, you already ARE an admin, but the OS still restricts your rights and prompts you, treating you AS IF you were a restricted user. Big difference.

For this particular attack, UAC is irrelevant. You have a non-admin user who is able to "promote" himself or herself to admin. UAC does not protect you at all as this exploit allows you to completely bypass user separation.

You are correct that UAC is a big feature of Vista, but this only helps those people who run as admin by default (who, admittedly, are the majority of computer users). If you use a restricted user account anyway, this has no impact.
Posted by: java.user   Posted on: 03/08/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Wow, yes, did not realize the last hack was because accounts were given out  DonnieBoy | 03/07/06
We don't even know that  tic swayback | 03/07/06
True, untill the give more information, this tells us nothing.  DonnieBoy | 03/07/06
Credit?  Fred Fredrickson | 03/07/06
They HAD to follow up on it  BitTwiddler | 03/08/06
they did mention  linuxoverwindows | 03/08/06
ZDnet was misleading!  An_Axe_to_Grind | 03/08/06
So who is taking bets?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/07/06
...  FreeBSD | 03/07/06
So before the machine is even compromised ...  ShadeTree | 03/08/06
RE: So who is taking bets?  crash89 | 03/07/06
Haven't your heard? There is one born everry minute. (nt)  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/07/06
Tada!!!  5th Limb in the Kisser | 03/07/06
Pretty Scary  crash89 | 03/07/06
one born...  linuxoverwindows | 03/08/06
Professional Hackers won?t advertise ?, a novice might, but ... (NT)  Vily Clay | 03/07/06
Professional Hackers? Is there such a thing?  Laff | 03/07/06
Oh, you believe that Osama is a dilettante because ...  Vily Clay | 03/07/06
At first I was going to say that Hacker to Terrorist was quite a stretch!  Laff | 03/08/06
Professional...  jasonp@... | 03/08/06
heh heh heh .... So are you saying there are those who  Laff | 03/08/06
distorted image  linuxoverwindows | 03/08/06
Can't the just call programers....programers?  Laff | 03/08/06
Laff, who's Osama - a professional or a dilettante? (NT)  Vily Clay | 03/08/06
definition...  linuxoverwindows | 03/08/06
You don't work in the intelligence field  Chad_z | 03/08/06
Define people who are making a living by high-scale hacking (NT)  Vily Clay | 03/08/06
I'll bet you that you'll LOSE!!!  5th Limb in the Kisser | 03/07/06
ZDNet isn't  Richard Flude | 03/07/06
Thanks, Dave.  zdnetGuy | 03/07/06
Kind of silly if you ask me  toadlife | 03/07/06
Yup  NonZealot | 03/07/06
Still a major advantage  Richard Flude | 03/07/06
Incorrect  java.user | 03/08/06
Correction  george_ou | 03/08/06
Not True  java.user | 03/08/06
Not.  nomorems | 03/08/06
i agree with this  linuxoverwindows | 03/08/06
And yet..  nomorems | 03/08/06
Nobody EVER listens to me!  JetJaguar | 03/07/06
Nope, not good enough  Boot_Agnostic | 03/08/06
like this?  linuxoverwindows | 03/08/06
btw: that was in a 24hr period.  linuxoverwindows | 03/08/06
Well, that should make anybody feel warm and fuzzy  Boot_Agnostic | 03/08/06
i would feel special...  linuxoverwindows | 03/09/06
The results are in!  crash89 | 03/08/06
I wish this guy would do the same test with a Windows XP product  mlindl | 03/08/06
well, i would say...  linuxoverwindows | 03/08/06
i like the idea myself  Monkey_MCSE | 03/08/06
For your infrmation  j.m.galvin | 03/08/06
then it sounds fair to test...  linuxoverwindows | 03/08/06
I forgot one thing  j.m.galvin | 03/08/06
so macs really are unhackable  corticus | 03/08/06
It's more secure than Windows  Chad_z | 03/08/06
Great Idea  miked@... | 03/08/06
in my post above...  linuxoverwindows | 03/08/06
Just saying  Boot_Agnostic | 03/08/06
Pointless  ibabadur1 | 03/08/06
why do hax0rz hax0r?  linuxoverwindows | 03/08/06
Most viruses don't attack port 80 or 443 anymore.  Narg | 03/08/06
Why worry then?  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 03/08/06
dont tell them our secret!  linuxoverwindows | 03/09/06
No danger.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 03/09/06
but there are still some...  linuxoverwindows | 03/09/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here