On MovieTome: Why you didn't see Shatner in TREK
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 15 of 51:
Next »
« Previous
Lovesick strikes again, more MS shilling.
---LOL, those nutty Linux fanboys are at it again---

More accurately, those nutty MS shill fanboys once again falling for more MS FUD. Are there no limits to the asinine garbage from your Redmond demi-god you won't engorge yourselves with? This is simply MS latest dodge to their deleterious code being exploited. Blame it on an accidental (?) code leak. Lots of PR value to bovine MS fanboys. Just another brainless PR piece to the rest of the world.

Linux users are not the least bit interested in this cheesy, clunky collection of caliginous crap MS dredged up from the bottom of the fetid code cesspool. Just reading the poppycock could lead to dementia. That's obvious from the chatter the MS shills inundate us with here. It's so convoluted it would cause any normal brain to go into lock-up.

I know, the MS fanboys pray the Linux folks are interested. That would give the MS fanboys some degree of validation---that the MS fanboys are not alone in being interested in endlessly looping spaghetti code. Sorry, you won't get the satisfaction from us. We don't need your id10tic code. We don't want your id10tic code. We're not interested in your id10tic code.

Take your neurosis elsewhere. Linux folks have a life, shouldn't you get one? Really! It's obvious you put your life into the hands of your Redmond demi-god. Does chairman billy make all your decisions? Do you even do your own f-----g?

---Thank God your not on the other boards I visit.---

Amen to that!

It appears MS has two classes of shills. They are:

1) Blind loyalist
2) Blind agitators

You appear to be in class 2.

Does MS really pay you enough to pretend(?) to be as dumb as your posts?

One more thought. Since this is about security, tell me:

1) How many MS computers were brought down by an easy exploit in the last two years and how many critical MS vulnerabilities were exploited in the last 2 years?

2) How many Linux computers were brought down by an easy exploit in the last two years and how many critical Linux vulnerabilities were exploited in the last 2 years?

To sum it up, to get a virus on a Linux box you have to really work at it. To get a virus on an MS box you simply have to work on it.

We've all heard your MS 'trustworth' FUD. After two years the incidents of mass MS virus infections is at an all-time high, even more than before the PR 'trustworthy' FUD.

My challenge is this: MS fanboys, put-up or shut-up!
Posted by: NoB$   Posted on: 02/18/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Who wrote this alteration of the facts?  OhMyGosh | 02/17/04
sneaky  bway al | 02/18/04
Yaaaaaaawn  Bobby Sskcat | 02/17/04
Security through Obscurity does NOT work  DonnieBoy | 02/17/04
Source code opens window to old IE flaw  Loverock Davidson | 02/17/04
Who are you talking to?  doe_z | 02/17/04
He's Troll, what do you expect?  voska | 02/18/04
Not just a troll, THE TROLL  voska | 02/18/04
Who are you talking to?  SC-man | 02/18/04
Yes, much of this code is still in Win2003.  DonnieBoy | 02/17/04
What on earth are you talking about?  Michael Kelly | 02/18/04
what do you expect  rock06r | 02/18/04
but...  ryusen | 02/18/04
However....  rock06r | 02/19/04
Lovesick strikes again, more MS shilling.  NoB$ | 02/18/04
how many  JWatson77 | 02/18/04
IE is the MOST secure web/browser and the MOST used browser FACT!  Xunil_Sierutuf. | 02/17/04
The evidence of lack of security in IE and Microsoft's OS  David Mohring | 02/18/04
Just because it is used more..  Suicida| | 02/18/04
Xunil_Sierutuf == Future is Linux?  John Le'Brecage | 02/18/04
Don't feed the imposter Trolls..  Xunil_Sierutuf | 02/18/04
Screen name  pschroeder@... | 02/18/04
HaHaHa  JWatson77 | 02/18/04
Message has been deleted.  Xunil_Sierutuf | 02/18/04
IE is the 'standard' browser for the internet  DonB_z | 02/17/04
Why?  Suicida| | 02/18/04
W3C makes standards, not IE  CobraA1 | 02/18/04
Sure it's the AOL standard  Jay Cash | 02/18/04
Microsoft's vulnerability - Are You Sure?  Dicko_z | 02/17/04
If that was the case  Suicida| | 02/18/04
The Bible: The Bill Gates Version  DragonBRockin | 02/18/04
Actually...  doctormoriarty | 02/18/04
ask you roem about that  JWatson77 | 02/18/04
move on, nothing to see here  pschroeder@... | 02/18/04
Just funny...  DragonBRockin | 02/18/04
11.8% of users vulnerable  Robert Carnegie | 02/18/04
Actually the bug may go a bit deeper...  John Le'Brecage | 02/18/04
5.01 user base scorned by later releases?  doctormoriarty | 02/18/04
Nothing more fun than source code diving  FilledOut | 02/18/04
what are you waiting for  JWatson77 | 02/18/04
SO WHAT?????  Stewart Cannon | 02/18/04
big fun with DOS on the net  Rembrandt Pussyhorse | 02/18/04
Another form of "Open Source" movement  toomuchgreeatea@... | 02/18/04
Actual Windows source code posted!  Rembrandt Pussyhorse | 02/18/04
I Just Realized  nikoli | 02/18/04
Linux Flaws  gsquared | 02/18/04
What is Linux version 4 and 6?  skeptic tank | 02/18/04
Is that like Win2008 and Win2009?  Damon K | 02/18/04
Re: Linux Flaws  none none | 02/18/04
If proof was need...  Richard Flude | 02/19/04
only 5.01?  ryusen | 02/18/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here