Homeland Security wraps up first mock cyberattack

TalkBack 44 of 69:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

you truly make me LAUGH

BTW, to let you know, this is Mr. Spicoli.
You kept saying you wanted smoking gun hard evidence in order for me or whoever else to persuade you. I've provided you with commercial news footage and you immediately deny that it's real. Do you realize how STUPID this is starting to make you look?
You asked for some real evidence which I provided, and then you go into immediate denial.
So according to you, me or someone else got someone to pretend they were an MSNBC reporter, and then stage some fake news setup. And you think **I** have far flung explanations?! Bwahahahahaha!!! So basically, you are NEVER going to admit that you're wrong (I've never seen you concede over anything, no matter how wrong you are). ANYTHING I could possibly show you you will just bat down saying it's all manufactured bunk.

"As for Larry pulling the 7th building, it is not uncommon to do so to avoid having that building fall over sideways to avoid more damage."

Aha! So you're finally seeing some light! What's hilarious though is you don't find it the least bit strange that a civilian building in the heart of downtown Manhattan was already professionally rigged with explosives BEFORE 9/11.
And no, they do not rig every skyscraper with explosives in case they have to control a demolition later on. This would amount to all of Manhattan being one huge bomb. The potential for something to go wrong is just too big a risk.
What's also hilarious is that you now admit to WTC7 being rigged with bombs, and yet still can't believe that WTC1,2 were rigged as well.

"That is not proof of who set it on fire to begin with."

Well GEE! Guess Osama had a raghead near WTC7 and the dude ran up and set the building on fire too, eh? It doesn't strike you as suspicious that some American (or a few) deliberately set the building on fire?!?!?! **WHY** would they do that?! DUH!

So you now admit that WTC7 was rigged, but refuse to even entertain the possibility that THE WHOLE COMPLEX was rigged along with it.
You also admit that WTC7 was not set on fire by peripheral damage from WTC1,2. It was DELIBERATELY SET ON FIRE by someone on the inside. So you're admitting that WTC7 was in no danger of collapsing (that is until someone saw to it that it'd go up in flames), and then find it perfectly normal that Silverstein "pulled" a building which in no way needed to be brought down. OK! Wow! Adn you think **I'm** not making sense!!! Amazing.

"The problem with conspiracy theories is they use the guilt by association theory instead proving with actual evidence of who the guilty party is."

But there IS actual evidence to back up what we're saying. Again, what's too funny is you brush aside EVERY bit of hard evidence thrown your way, and yet are perfectly content (and not suspicious) of the federal government which has provided you with **ZERO** evidence. Yes, you're taking the mere word of a bunch of Zionist fascists who you yourself even admitted are followers of the infamous Nazi fascist, Leo Strauss. You can't believe that current American officials who beleive in and follow a Nazi ideology could possibly take part in a 9/11 against their own people. **WHY** do you place so much blind trust in these men, who are clearly not to be trusted in the least bit???

"They also manufacture false evidence, suppress the real evidence to support the hypothesis."

And yet this is PRECISELY what the federal government has done. Didn't they tell us that WTC7 fell due to peripheral damage from WTC1,2? And didn't you just admit that Silverstein "pulled" the building? So here even you yourself have admitted that that feds have manufactured false evidence, and suppressed it later (by not even mentioning ONCE the collapse of WTC7 by the 9/11 Warren Commission!)
So here you have indirectly admitted that what the US government has told us thus far can only be a conspiracy theory (for you have shown that they have manufactured false evidence and suppressed the real).

"How are those fake photoshops or those cut and splice WMVs to tell the REAL truth going?"

Here's another thing that makes me LAUGH. If you think a mere anybody like me can perform all this photoshop wizardry in order to concoct propaganda, you really mean to tell me you don't think the federal government can perform feats so far beyond what I'd be capable of???

"So many different theories which one do I choose. It is all bunk."

Once again, you contradict yourself. Apparently you don't think that part about Silverstein "pulling" the building was bunk.......eh?

PS -- a serious question: for months I have been providing you with links where you see Silverstein discussing the "pull". You always shot it down as nonsense. And now suddenly you're a believer. WHAT WAS IT that finally convinced you?

Posted by: 5th Limb in the Kisser   Posted on: 02/11/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Why Isn't Server Virtualization Saving Us More? A Few Small Changes May Dramatically Increase Your Efficiency VMware Companies have rapidly adopted server virtualization over the past few ... Download Now
• Five Steps to Determine When to Virtualize YourServers VMware Server virtualization isn't just for big companies. Entry-level ... Download Now
• Building the Virtualized Enterprise with VMware Iinfrastructure VMware VMware virtualization software has been adopted by over 120,000 enterprise ... Download Now