On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 35 of 121:
Next »
« Previous
If you already have 1.5.0.1 ...
then you are probably connected to the Internet and already got your patched version delivered to you in the background a week ago.

But that doesn't actually address the question that you asked, does it?

There were two critical level fixes and three moderate level fixes. The three moderate level ones do not affect FF 1.0.x, so they are FF 1.5.x specific. Of the two critical fixes only one is *nix-alike specific:

http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/mfsa2006-04.html

"H D Moore of the Metasploit Project published a working exploit on milw0rm for the Linux and Mac OS X versions of Firefox 1.5. Severity upgraded to critical."

So if you don't use the Internet you won't need to patch your 'Doze version [of anything, really] and if you do then you should already have what you need unless some other OS flaw has kept you from getting the update.
Posted by: Still Lynn   Posted on: 02/08/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Easy as pie.  IT Scion | 02/08/06
no brainer to keep current  BXLE | 02/08/06
With FF, you will not be required to take other updates to get security fix  DonnieBoy | 02/08/06
If you don't like it...  toadlife | 02/08/06
Well, yes...now that you mention it...  techboy_z | 02/08/06
Break out a sticky note  Still Lynn | 02/08/06
Talkbacks are where we argue about the merits of just about anything.  DonnieBoy | 02/08/06
So Very True But even better  IceTheNet@... | 02/08/06
One point to be sure  Cayble | 02/08/06
Yo! Toadlet!  Still Lynn | 02/08/06
So you admit Firefox update is easier  Fred Fredrickson | 02/08/06
Hey DonnieBoy: This is what the "best and brightest" think of you...  John Zern | 02/08/06
Well, that has little to do with Firefox security.  DonnieBoy | 02/08/06
Well, the connection being  John Zern | 02/08/06
Well, I will pay for my own bandwidth usage. If Google uses too much  DonnieBoy | 02/08/06
Vanna! 2nd cluestick strike needed here!  Still Lynn | 02/08/06
Vanna! I'd like to buy a clue!  Still Lynn | 02/08/06
Touch?  John Zern | 02/08/06
I agree...  bill@... | 02/08/06
I agree too wink  petit@... | 02/08/06
Did I read that right?  nomorems | 02/08/06
Never heard of Windoze. What is it?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/08/06
Gee..  nomorems | 02/08/06
STFU???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/08/06
Watch how fast you get sued  voska | 02/08/06
I must have missed something  John Zern | 02/08/06
I must have missed something too  mdsmedia | 02/08/06
Take LinSUX? No thanks.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/08/06
Silly ABMers!  NonZealot | 02/08/06
Message has been deleted.  Jeff Spicoli | 02/08/06
Jeff.. How did you know..  widge_z | 02/08/06
Message has been deleted.  Jeff Spicoli | 02/08/06
Never heard of Windoze?  Still Lynn | 02/08/06
Come on! Everybody knows Windoze...  John Zern | 02/09/06
If you already have 1.5.0.1 ...  Still Lynn | 02/08/06
Whats the big deal  I'm Ye, the MS SHILL . | 02/08/06
Whats?  cdgoldin | 02/10/06
Mozilla developers downplaying threats again?  toadlife | 02/08/06
That's a very good point  Michael Kelly | 02/08/06
Microsoft's definition of "critical"  jinko | 02/08/06
Patch Tuesday  Yensi717 | 02/08/06
Lame  Suicida| | 02/08/06
Patch Tuesday  jinko | 02/09/06
Is Jinko's definition better?  cdgoldin | 02/10/06
Because...  todbran@... | 02/08/06
Is it really downplaying?  Redsheep | 02/09/06
Has the warrant been issued yet?  Anton Philidor | 02/08/06
Would you issue a warrant for the makers of Nessus?  george_ou | 02/08/06
Most feeds  Suicida| | 02/08/06
Exploit code is malware...  Anton Philidor | 02/08/06
And how would you keep that a secret in auditing code?  george_ou | 02/08/06
That's really nice!  european | 02/09/06
What's your point?  george_ou | 02/09/06
You're talking about security auditing code.  Anton Philidor | 02/09/06
There is no difference  george_ou | 02/09/06
YOU WAKE UP!!!!  Cayble | 03/02/06
For what? It's not an exploit.  Fred Fredrickson | 02/08/06
I believed ZDNet.  Anton Philidor | 02/08/06
It's called a hook  Fred Fredrickson | 02/08/06
Not just the headline, but a direct statement.  Anton Philidor | 02/09/06
Couple of points ...  Henaway | 02/08/06
Only Linux and Mac versions were released today  george_ou | 02/08/06
Alternate time stream?  Still Lynn | 02/08/06
Windows was earlier still  llewysm | 02/09/06
The question was asked earlier.  mdsmedia | 02/08/06
What code?  Fred Fredrickson | 02/08/06
1.5.0.1 Kills Gmail attachments  nlnnet | 02/08/06
not for me  doh123 | 02/08/06
Submit a bug report  Still Lynn | 02/08/06
What another inadequately tested patch from M$, oops make that Mozilla?  cdgoldin | 02/10/06
Wow....  todbran@... | 02/08/06
Can't turn off ActiveX nag in IE.  enduser_z | 02/08/06
Instead of turning it off  Yensi717 | 02/08/06
Can't turn off ActiveX nag in IE.  zeeper | 02/09/06
Try it, you will see what I mean.  enduser_z | 02/09/06
Clueless griping. Use Maxthon. (Yes, really.)  ZenWarrior | 02/09/06
Pointless Posturing. Get over yourself. (Yes, really.)  enduser_z | 02/09/06
memory useage  tmartin827@... | 02/08/06
What pages are you viewing?  nomorems | 02/08/06
Huh? What memory leaks? (Again, Maxthon!)  ZenWarrior | 02/09/06
Hey Todbran if two high school kids developed Fire Fox they're............  Can you hear me | 02/08/06
Faulty logic  cdgoldin | 02/10/06
uses more memory how?  doh123 | 02/08/06
Yes..  nomorems | 02/08/06
lack of credibility  IceTheNet@... | 02/08/06
Lack of equity  cdgoldin | 02/10/06
Load Times  Pony99CA | 02/11/06
Loaded times  cdgoldin | 02/13/06
Memory usage - this fix helped me  gow1000 | 02/09/06
M$ is spreading FUD  Linux Geek | 02/08/06
I was wondering  Shelendrea | 02/08/06
Look who's talking about FUD!  Still Lynn | 02/08/06
Payback is a *****, Luke.  osreinstall | 02/08/06
So it' you...  bargeemike | 02/09/06
Yes, I am your father.  osreinstall | 02/09/06
No, that job is better left to the "Linux Geek"  cdgoldin | 02/10/06
Never fails.....  proprietary | 03/03/06
1.5.0.1 Check Updates does not see update.  jimjutte | 02/08/06
1.5.0.1 is the latest version  mdsmedia | 02/08/06
So...  zkiwi | 02/08/06
No, people will continue to use software as usual  Boot_Agnostic | 02/08/06
What about us who's still using 1.07  tana99 | 02/08/06
As above posts point out...  bargeemike | 02/09/06
Mozilla are downplaying vulnerabilities again!  smigol | 02/09/06
Trolls, X-ing!  An_Axe_to_Grind | 02/09/06
Firefox updated itself before the flaw was even public! AWESOME!!!!  xunil skcor | 02/09/06
Just like Microsoft has done many times!  cdgoldin | 02/10/06
Redmond thinks it is...  devlin_X | 02/16/06
Yes, But...  EBathory | 02/09/06
Yes, but.... Think twice  Redsheep | 02/09/06
Or even thrice  cdgoldin | 02/10/06
I never had any problems with the update.  KWierso | 02/10/06
C'mon Aunty Liz...  bargeemike | 02/13/06
*cough* *cough* WMF?!  duane.wills@... | 02/09/06
Is it a "coincidence" that when NEW severe flaws are  michael_t | 02/09/06
problem upgrading  Scott W | 02/10/06
sorry my mistake  Scott W | 02/10/06
Firefox  johnfarnham@... | 02/12/06
firefox may not update extensions  janitorman | 02/13/06
better instructions are at:  janitorman | 02/13/06
linux causing ms exploits - how on earth does this affect firefox?  jesus_of_suburbia344 | 02/14/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and