On CBS MoneyWatch: Deal or no deal? 8 lousy 'bargains'
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 11 of 12:
Next »
« Previous
My thoughts exactly. You have to report even ENCRYPTED backup tapes being
lost, but you do not have to report that un-encrypted data was on a computer connected to the internet for years where it is 1000x more likely to have been compromised. Man, imagine if you have the data on a Windows server connected to the internet. We are talking 1,000,000,000x more likely. No reporting required. Someone could have hacked the compuer 1000 times without the knowledge of the owner (anyone using a Windows server is typically clueless). Still, no reporting necessary as long as you don't know about a break in.
Posted by: DonnieBoy   Posted on: 02/07/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Not such a big deal after all  Roger Ramjet | 02/07/06
So, I'm assuming that ...  coffeenite | 02/07/06
But, there are thousands of things more dangeraous than lost backup tapes,  DonnieBoy | 02/07/06
Sure, there are more dangerous things ...  coffeenite | 02/07/06
But we are talking 1000x more dangerous, with no reporting required.  DonnieBoy | 02/08/06
Yes ...  coffeenite | 02/08/06
Oracle is the easy part  voska | 02/07/06
Organized criminals would NOT go after tapes, they don't want you to know  DonnieBoy | 02/08/06
Why the the average thief?  jsargent | 02/08/06
People don't find tapes......  Edj_z | 02/08/06
My thoughts exactly. You have to report even ENCRYPTED backup tapes being  DonnieBoy | 02/07/06
So, you have data on an internet facing computer. A zero day  DonnieBoy | 02/07/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here