On mySimon: Adidas Men's Gil Zero Basketball Shoe
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 5 of 9:
Next »
« Previous
I'm waiting...
... for the apologists to come back and tell us all how everyone else in the world is just incompetent, because THEY can secure their windows desktops and servers...

I will post this link once again, for posterity:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/security/security_report_windows_vs_linux/#winvslinuxdesign
(Aparantly it is too technical for some to comprehend?)

I am not a lawyer, but I would imagine that if MS was advised against this architecture, then proceeded regardless, proves negligence. Wouldn't a reasonable person come to the same conclusion? I don't know for sure that they were advised against this, but simple logic says they were.

Thoughts?
Posted by: Spikey_Mike   Posted on: 01/20/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Oh No!  Jack-Booted EULA | 01/19/06
Correction: Microsoft security problems cost 67 billion.  DonnieBoy | 01/19/06
Another thing, we need to plan on there being criminals.  DonnieBoy | 01/19/06
The sky is falling so reported Chicken Little @FBI headquarters  Can you hear me | 01/19/06
I'm waiting...  Spikey_Mike | 01/20/06
Sony BMG costs $67 Billion in losses.....  oldskillz | 01/20/06
So how does this get figured in when they calculate TCO?  George Mitchell | 01/20/06
I saved a whole bunch of money by switching to GEICO!  osreinstall | 01/21/06
And we blindly believe this because...  HypnoToad | 01/27/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads